Rememeber also that an important part of R&D exists not only to make new inventions but to make once expensive things cheaper/easier to make.
This is why we can have nice things!
This is why we can have nice things!
Are company like Naim, Meridian, ATC, Cyrus (plus hundered more) all waisting their time developing new products and technologies... should they sack everyone?
Insufferable arrogance.
I view the recording process as creative. It is like painting, to use a bad analogy. mics, eqs, consoles, reverbs...these are all like colors or paintbrushes, with the songs being the canvas. the engineer/producer the artist.
At the risk of getting caught in the cross-fire here aren't ATC, for example, using components in their speakers that haven't changed in many years?
That dosen't mean that there is no R & D but that the relative advancement of such matters in the context of the law of diminishing returns, I assume, is bound to slow?
At the risk of getting caught in the cross-fire here aren't ATC, for example, using components in their speakers that haven't changed in many years?
That dosen't mean that there is no R & D but that the relative advancement of such matters in the context of the law of diminishing returns, I assume, is bound to slow?
How is it arrogant?the arrogance of such a statement.
At the risk of getting caught in the cross-fire here aren't ATC, for example, using components in their speakers that haven't changed in many years?
That dosen't mean that there is no R & D but that the relative advancement of such matters in the context of the law of diminishing returns, I assume, is bound to slow?
IIRC you can put people on an ignore list, its in the user CP pull downs above!
I know some exceptionally highly regarded tonmeisters and engineers who would choke on the arrogance of such a statement. Which is why I think it's better to walk away than to pander to the ego of a jumped-up console jockey with monumental delusions of grandeur.
I think this place could benefit from an 'ignore' button.
Yes. Audio is an extremely mature subject. A lot of the ground rules in loudspeakers date back to Rice/Kellogg in the 1920s, Olsen in the 1930s and 1940s and Vilchur in the 1950s. A lot of the engineering modelling systems hark back to the Eureka project in the 1970s and the design of MLS and FFT-based audio analysers in the 1980s.
To say as a result everything is all wrapped up is somewhat disingenuous though. There continues to be research into materials science for both drive units and cabinets, as well as more research into resonance and air-flow.
The 'all the science is finished' argument is ultimately a little nonsensical. You could say the same about automotive engineering; we are often driving round in 19th Century engineering concepts, but with 21st Century improvements.
A dealers told me they have orders placed already It's been mentioned the R&D work done on the 25's has been trickled down to create this new additional range.