gavreid
Pretty Words...
...what appears to be true
Give over. They should be attacking Trump for recognising Jerusalem as the Israeli capital and the Golan Heights - that's the real reason that the pro-Israel lobby is attacking Corbyn.
...what appears to be true
Local election campaign starts?
Time for another round of smears.
As General Secretary, Jenny Formby has done more to tackle this issue in a year than the Blairite twerp Ian McNicol did in in years.
Stories like this that trash the efforts of her and her team disgust me.
So are the figures in the article not correct? Do they not reveal an issue?
Give over. They should be attacking Trump for recognising Jerusalem as the Israeli capital and the Golan Heights - that's the real reason that the pro-Israel lobby is attacking Corbyn.
"Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu has said he will annex Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank if he is re-elected."
Can this - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-47840033 - be discussed without accusations of anti-semitism being bandied about?
In other words look away nothing to see here, oh look Concorde...
The issue here is that of the 950ish complaints made, around 450 are unresolved and about 250 not investigated. Alongside that offences that should have resulted in suspension haven’t. However anti-semitism in the Labour Party isn’t an issue says the supporters of Corbyn. That’s good to know.
The trouble for Hodge and Co is that they have to prove the accusations - they never had to do this in previous witch hunts under Kinnock and Blair
It’s for those appointed by the NEC to prove or disprove the issues. It’s not for the complainant. If you were to complain about my posting on here, it would be for someone else to decide whether I’d breached the AUP. Likewise if I was accused of a criminal act, once the complaint was made, it’s for the police to gather evidence and produce a case. Then a court has to decide.
Look if anyone's an anti-semite they have no place in the Labour party - I hope anyway, I'm not a member, but the boy who cried wolf is in play here, can you not see that...
That's nonsense too - there needs to be some proof in support any formal accusation
Well why not publish them in an anonymised fashion? I’m sure there haven’t been 900 he said/she said accusations.
How sure? That's the issue it seems...
Sure enough that if it had been they’d have published some of the spurious complaints...
Tony says he doesn't want I/P threads on the forum.Start a thread, and see.
My QC strongly advises against it!Start a thread, and see.
Figures without context don’t tell us much though. Are these spread over time and it’s an ineffectual response from the party, or are they bunched together like some form of DDOS attack? The way this is playing out, it feels like a campaign, so I’d not be surprised to learn that Labour’s complaints system was overwhelmed. Not a great excuse after all this time, but not the deliberate overlooking of issues it is painted as, if so.In other words look away nothing to see here, oh look Concorde...
The issue here is that of the 950ish complaints made, around 450 are unresolved and about 250 not investigated. Alongside that offences that should have resulted in suspension haven’t. However anti-semitism in the Labour Party isn’t an issue says the supporters of Corbyn. That’s good to know.
They just turn it on and off like a tap, this whole fabricated, so-called anti-Semitism 'scandal'.
Netanyahu is a master of timing.