I appreciate you weren’t being serious, but if I may be, what does have something to do with many of the cases of antisemitism highlighted by the BDBJ and others, is Labour MP’s criticising the state of Israel.
The big row about Labour not adopting the IHRA in full was because Labour did accept the IHRA definition but added a bit to make it clearer that criticism of the state of Israel was not in itself antisemitic.
I’m quite prepared to accept that I’m not in full possession of all the facts, and that there might be compelling evidence that those *highlighted are in fact racists and deserve all they get, but the evidence presented so far appears to be of people criticising the state of Israel, which is not antisemitic.
*I’m talking about those highlighted by the BDBJ, there are undoubtedly other lower profile cases of racist nutters, such as a holocaust deniers, who have no place in decent society and have been rightly dealt with.
If there is evidence, why isn’t it in the Rabbi’s rant? If Corbyn is such a threat, whereas the evidence? Has he come out with comments about people looking like “letter boxes’ or ‘bombers’ or having ‘watermelon smiles’, or being ‘pickaninnies’?