droodzilla
pfm Member
Liz Kendall voted against the tax-cuts. Nuff said.
Nicola Sturgeon called it "shameful" and Liz Truss said that "there was space for Mr McDonnell on the Tory frontbench". I expect they were referring to McDonnell's validation of tax cuts for the better off. I'm sure Momentum members will be as baffled as I am at the apparent hypocrisy.
Crankie look alike not afraid to tax higher earners shock -So, a totally useless Tory and a Crankies lookalike make dumb comments in a typical attempt to make capital and you think it's a big deal. That's because YOU also do the same thing because of your hatred and fear of left wing Labour.
I know many Momentum members and am one myself. Nobody thinks anything about McDonnels comments other than what has been explained to you previously. Labour Party members are confident that the Labour government (coming soon folks) will have the interests of the low paid at the very centre of all of their policies.
Crankie look alike not afraid to tax higher earners shock -
"The 2018-19 Scottish budget will ensure that 7 out of 10 income taxpayers in Scotland pay less tax next year, including everyone earning less than £33,000. And most Scots will pay less tax than if they lived in rest of the UK."
https://www.snp.org/policies/pb-how-will-the-changes-to-scottish-income-tax-affect-me/
Hey, I like her. I think she's good. I also have a lot of time for the SNP. But it doesn't take away from my point that it was political points scoring.
The First Minister said the Tory "mask has well and truly slipped" in this week's Budget and proved the UK Government stands for "tax cuts for the wealthiest and cuts for everyone else."Hey, I like her. I think she's good. I also have a lot of time for the SNP. But it doesn't take away from my point that it was political points scoring.
Come off it gassor. By the time Labour get in the rates will already have been cut, meaning that Labour would have to hike them. The manifesto targeted those earning over £80,000. Now they'd be targeting those earning over £50,000. And the Conservative would be able to say, "You see? They said 80 grand but they didn't mean it. Who's next?"Oh dear, hit a raw nerve have I? The 2017 manifesto did not say they would cut tax rates for the middle classes, so you are talking rubbish.
I'm disappointed you cannot keep the discussion on a reasonable level, but it looks your posturing has run out of steam. Nobody in politics is above criticism not even Saint Jeremy and his cohorts.
This is obvious, as is the self-interested nature of this play by Kendall, McGovern, Cooper et al. They've always fought for the poor, haven't they? Even if it meant pissing off the middle classes! Whereas McDonnell, he's mister floating voter isn't he? Never given a toss about the low paid.
Come off it gassor. By the time Labour get in the rates will already have been cut, meaning that Labour would have to hike them. The manifesto targeted those earning over £80,000. Now they'd be targeting those earning over £50,000. And the Conservative would be able to say, "You see? They said 80 grand but they didn't mean it. Who's next?"
Come off it gassor. By the time Labour get in the rates will already have been cut, meaning that Labour would have to hike them. The manifesto targeted those earning over £80,000. Now they'd be targeting those earning over £50,000. And the Conservative would be able to say, "You see? They said 80 grand but they didn't mean it. Who's next?"
This is obvious, as is the self-interested nature of this play by Kendall, McGovern, Cooper et al. They've always fought for the poor, haven't they? Even if it meant pissing off the middle classes! Whereas McDonnell, he's mister floating voter isn't he? Never given a toss about the low paid.