darrenyeats
pfm Member
Geoff Norcott often makes me laugh and he's right of centre.
I struggle to understand why any thinking human would be right wing.
John Wayne was 100% right-wing, but Clint Eastwood’s politics are not so easily categorised. He is registered as a supporter of the US Libertarian party, which is a mix of very progressive (environmental protection, LGBT rights, anti-racism) and very conservative (small government, gun rights, fiscal conservatism) viewpoints.And of the, say, 10 greatest Hollywood actors of all time, are you sure left-wingers are the majority ? John Wayne, Clint Eastwood, etc.
No.The funniest explicitly political comedy series (Yes, Minister) was written by two blokes, one right-wing, one left-wing. (The Thick Of It might have been funnier, but I found it impossible to watch because of the hand-held camera work).
But let's suppose, for the sake of argument, that you watch a new comedian and you laugh out loud at their routine. You have no idea whether he/she is left or right-wing, but you find out the next day that he/she is in fact right-wing. Does that suddenly make them less funny?
Maybe because it takes a brain to be a comedian
Geoff Norcott has never made me laugh.Geoff Norcott often makes me laugh and he's right of centre.
Maybe right-wingers are just happier.
... Maybe right-wingers are just happier. ...
Anecdotally comedians are sad, depressed people who crave applause and validation. Maybe right-wingers are just happier. All depends how you define comedy and comedian though, which I doubt we could agree on. Presumably we are talking about people who call themselves comedians.
As long as the he did not end up with egg on his faceThen there are the accidental comedians. Chap agitating in his wife's well-attended fertility clinic tried to lighten the air by telling a few jokes to the waiting partners. He received a standing ovulation.
At least they produce something instead of talking hot airBecause right wing viewers have to work down the factory in the morning.
The original argument is flawed, and assumes that people’s political beliefs cannot be changed by experience. (That itself is a sad reflection on how polarised political opinion has become: political allegiance is being peddled as identity, rather than something that one is free to change as circumstances change)