Effects?
There are questions about how much of japans agricultural land has been made dangerous by the radiation blow out, there is also a similar question about marine pollution and in particular (for now) shellfish being off limits on the NE coast, the 'fiasco' included the Tsunami. The amount of arable land there is mostly limited to the coastal strip - a great wadge of land is affected - at least till they alter the acceptable exposure levels for crops and farmers etc.
Surface crops cereals etc do better than sub surface crops such as potatoes, but rice lies in water and water rich plants eg tomatoes also end up radiated.
There is no agreed number of deaths from Chernobyl even among the firemen who saved the day and nobody bothered about the Reindeer. So re the OP theres plenty of effects but no one will admit anyone has died from it except the ...as ever .. firemen, nuclear workers etc
With US and japanese and Global Nuke Industry on the job one may (IMHO) rest assured there will be no official figures on death from FukUshima. I note that the mass media no longer provides public info on what radiation from Japan is being found these days around the globe.No doubt figs for injuries from wind turbines will soon emerge.
However the pro Nuke have taken a huge knock in credibility and I pray what I feel is a global human concensus (just say No) prevails.
The Germans and Japs are dead set against Nuke power, the Italian People are just about the same, here I feel the wheels are turning - even in the US though some 5 are near completion - if FukUshima just goes on getting worse then I doubt the other 20 or so on the US books will go ahead. As of now
2 US plants are a serious cause for concern due to Missouri floods etc
Im with the 'lets use less mob' not the 'let me sell you more' brigade