DimitryZ
pfm Member
That's the problem in a nutshell. It's always higher ideals, good principles and egalitarianism until reality intervenes.No. Unless you know something I don't, it's a random bloke letting off steam on the Internet. Pretty extreme, I think, so I have no intention of engaging with him. I'd say the same about KenniGT (or whatever he was called) who was urging us to drop a nuclear bomb on Moscow, not so long ago.
I've made my position clear many times on this thread. A large part of it is a meta-position: I do not think that (e.g.) inserting context or nuance to the discussion is tantamount to being an apologist for Putin. Any suggestion that it is (and there have been some) is a form of neo-McCarthyism and contrary to liberal values.
As for the substantive question of how the war is settled, that is for Ukraine and Russia to work out. I am happy that the West is showing support by imposing sanctions (assuming they are targeted and effective) and taking steps to ostracize Russia from the international community. I am less comfortable with sending (presumably selling) weapons to Ukraine but that's because the thought of arms companies profiting from mass slaughter turns my stomach. Your mileage may vary.
Finally, please don't @ me again, especially if you're going to put words into my mouth. I follow this thread quite closely and will engage with others, in good faith, as and when I feel the need.
It's always "peace talks" until your partner comes in and tells you that his peace proposal is for you to surrender or he will kill you and your family.
And it's utter inability to understand that this what Russia has become under Putin, even as it happily spits on your face.