Oh, a grammar thread. How exciting!
You assume he has considered that semi-colon previously. If he has not, he cannot reconsider it at all.Joe, you might want to reconsider that semi-colon. ;-)
You assume he has considered that semi-colon previously. If he has not, he cannot reconsider it at all.
One should never begin a sentence with and.
And I do believe this is outdated and your advocacy is testimony to your age .
One should never begin a sentence with and.
Or even lossy digital, where it's not audibly detectable.
JC
Oxford dictionaries describe starting a sentence with and as 'an unspeakable offence against the English language.' lol may be old, but I am also correct. I rest my case.
I had my semi-colon removed, and now I have to punctuate into a bag.
As a consequence, I find grammar pedants to be fewer interesting than used to I did.
FFS what does any of this have to do with the original post???
your dictionary is clearly as old as you . If not older .
Someone should have told the writers of the Authorised Version:
And the LORD said unto Moses, Depart, and go up hence, thou and the people which thou hast brought up out of the land of Egypt, unto the land which I sware unto Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, saying, Unto thy seed will I give it: And I will send an angel before thee; and I will drive out the Canaanite, the Amorite, and the Hittite, and the Perizzite, the Hivite, and the Jebusite: Unto a land flowing with milk and honey: for I will not go up in the midst of thee; for thou art a stiffnecked people: lest I consume thee in the way.
And when the people heard these evil tidings, they mourned: and no man did put on him his ornaments. For the LORD had said unto Moses, Say unto the children of Israel, Ye are a stiffnecked people: I will come up into the midst of thee in a moment, and consume thee: therefore now put off thy ornaments from thee, that I may know what to do unto thee. And the children of Israel stripped themselves of their ornaments by the mount Horeb.
I always thought that book was generally derided as a source of truth on PFM?