Rockmeister
pfm Member
and now, silence
In that context it is a conjecture. A proposition. You seem to be using it as odd gauge for reality.The null hypothesis says that in the absence of evidence there isn't a difference.
Personally, I’m still sad that no-one has been able to tell me what the system comprised, apart from Wadax digital thingies and Shunyata cables, obviously!
Wot about the big egg timers?Streamer - £230k (Wadax Reference Server - £55k, Wadax Reference Power Supply - £42k, Wadax Reference DAC - £133k)
Pre amplifier - £50k (Engstrom Monica)
Power amplifiers - £142k (Engstrom Eric)
Speakers - £64k (Kroma Matilde)
C
'hypothesis' == 'conjecture.'In that context it is a conjecture. A proposition. You seem to be using it as odd gauge for reality.
Wot about the big egg timers?
(Oops, different system but what in tarnation are they??)
As above, though the standmounts which obviously made an impression are the new Kroma Macbeth starting at £24K plus standsPersonally, I’m still sad that no-one has been able to tell me what the system comprised, apart from Wadax digital thingies and Shunyata cables, obviously!
I'm amazed we still appear to be having a discussion about the sound of cables, or not, as in the case here. I thought this was all put to bed back in the 1980s when Hitachi came out with the LC-OCC copper cable and every one was raving about how good it was over and above QED 79 strand. I remember all too well visiting HiFi_Dave back in the early 1980s and he had just had a visit from Bé Yamamura who had, with his audio connections in Japan, got Furukawa Electric Co, a massive industrial cable company, to make a very high spec microphone cable with OCC Litz wire and special insulation. HiFi_Dave was going nuts about how good this cable was. Still anything that Bé did was good. I borrowed some of the cable and also heard how good it was. I was just about to order a Helius Orion tonearm through HiFi_Dave and we managed to get it made with Bé's cable for the tonearm arm lead. The tonearm and the cable was amazing and it is still a very good cable today. If HiFi_Dave is on here I am sure he might comment on Bé's blue cable...The bit where absolutely everything makes a difference isn't true. I do develop products, it's part of my job. I do it by science and yes, I do use incremental improvements. Only yesterday I was talking a group through a root cause analysis, 5 whys etc. to determine what caused an incident here. Part of that is dismissing the stuff that is just incidental, such as the colour of lacquer used on a bike frame. You talk about F1. An F1 car doesn't use special cables, it uses normal copper, it's reasonable to assume that's because they have looked at the possibility of using them, determined that there is no benefit and moved on. If a hifi needs them, then we need to understand why. You're making the assumption that everything has been considered and measured as making a benefit, and that there's nothing that's just there. I'm saying that I doubt it, there's some stuff that's in there because it's expected by the consumer base. It's marketing driven. F1 cars and racing bicycles have to look pretty. Hifi has to have similar.
Wadex digital, Brinkmann turntable, Engström electronics, Kroma Atelier (Matilde & MacBeth) loudspeakers, Shunyata cables and Bassocontinuo equipment stands AdamPersonally, I’m still sad that no-one has been able to tell me what the system comprised, apart from Wadax digital thingies and Shunyata cables, obviously!
You seem to be suggesting that you could prove the presence of a god. Brave!In the absence of evidence, you can't make extraordinary claims.
Nobody can prove a negative. I can't prove the absence of a god.
I am glad that those who design bridges, skyscrapers, aeroplanes and the like do not try this approach!Which might mean we have to somehow muddle along with opinions and experiences and other subjective stuff, and acknowledge that not everything which matters comes with a published, peer-reviewed evidence base. And perhaps try to hold our own opinions lightly.
Did you find a flaw in my exposition of @stevec67 ‘s logic?I am glad that those who design bridges, skyscrapers, aeroplanes and the like do not try this approach!
Tell me you've capitulated without saying you've capitulated. LOL.'hypothesis' == 'conjecture.'
Equivalent terms, different language-base by about 1500yrs, is all.
Do you also shout at clouds?
Well I certainly do. Try reading your post again.Did you find a flaw in my exposition of @stevec67 ‘s logic?
Separately, I can think of at least one aeroplane which may well have been designed by appropriately qualified scientists and rigorously tested by those who rigorously test.. yet still failed in service. Humility has a place even in science-centric enterprises.