Tony L
Administrator
Still not getting it. As it's possible to get the stylus/cartridge zenith perfectly zero at the desired null point by moving the arm pivot forwards or backwards what does the stylus tip distance have to do with it?
When designing an arm the offset angle is very tightly mathematically related to the pivot to spindle distance. The former can really only be calculated once the latter is defined. As such by moving the pivot to spindle distance, as the SME slide system does, can technically introduce an infinitesimally small ‘error’ in the offset angle at anything other than the nominal ideal position. In practice it is irrelevant as almost all cartridges are within just a mm of the same length and I’m sure SME went with such an easy to mount/easy to use system that even compensated for armbase mounting error. It was a remarkably clever engineering approach to the problem IMHO and in the vast majority of cases will end up with a cartridge in at least as good alignment as other arms given the “skillset” of most dealers and end-users.
PS When discussing this we can really only consider cartridges with absolutely square bodies, with cantilevers that are perfectly square to those bodies, and tips mounted in perfect alignment on those cantilevers. Anything other than this has almost certainly already introduced far more alignment error into the system by being impossible to sight accurately against a template. There is a special place in hell for the designers of rounded cartridge bodies!