Jim Audiomisc
pfm Member
I'm biassed. I'd say the best amps ever were the Armstrong 730+732.
What's interesting about the Supernait (all generations) and the Nait XS apparently, is that they are a significant departure from the power amp topology of the incumbent classic Naim amplifiers.I think the Supernait 3 is a superb box. If I wasn't into DIY it would be my amplifier of choice.
What I like about this box it has Naims signature PRaT in abundance but also brings out the decay in the music, so as well as producing the leading edge and body of the music you hear the end as well. This gives good coherence to the music so the individual players can be heard playing together with a sense of depth as well as width. This might not quite be the last word in detail or holographic imaging but it's still pretty good in that regard as well.
Add to that a good phono section and no need for a HiCap (I believe the internal supplies are already good enough) makes this a great buy (in my humble opinion)
A pretty good way of choosing amps or anything else. I well remember a morning at Sounds of Music in Sussex where they left me with half a dozen CD players to try. They all did the job and if concentrating on the sound were fairly similar but with some I found my attention wandering whereas, somewhat surprisingly, with a Marantz SACD player my attention was glued to the music, all thought of comparisons banished. Quite why that was I really don’t know but it was repeatable; so much for a dedicated CD player being best.In my experience judging amps only gains credulity when it is partnered with certain speakers and also it is a matter of subjective personal taste.
I heard the ATC SIA2-100 amp connected to ATC SCM40 speakers playing Money by Pink Floyd. I also in the same day heard Hegel H160 amp connected to Amphion speakers playing the same Money by Pink Floyd. The first system sounded musical, compulsive and exciting. When the track picked up the tempo my god the system surely indicated the sudden increase in tempo, I started thinking what this system would do to my music collection. As to the second system all sounded correct, very balanced, had all the hi fi niceties but for me it was so bland, I felt if I had to listen to this system for a certain period I would fall asleep...!
Yes I noted exactly the sameWhat's interesting about the Supernait (all generations) and the Nait XS apparently, is that they are a significant departure from the power amp topology of the incumbent classic Naim amplifiers.
Instead of the psuedo-complimentary output stages of the classic amps, using only NPN transistors, they use a fully complimentary Sziklai output stage and also a cascode pair VAS stage.
I only discovered this info recently and am surprised it hasn't been discussed more in the DIY section of this forum, unless I've missed it somewhere. I suspect the above is why the Supernait sounds so good and punches above its weight.
I'm also guessing the latest "new classic" Naim designs follow on from this topology, though I can't say I've seen it mentioned anywhere.
Bland probably means lack of get up and go or PRaT in Naim speak!In my experience judging amps only gains credulity when it is partnered with certain speakers and also it is a matter of subjective personal taste.
I heard the ATC SIA2-100 amp connected to ATC SCM40 speakers playing Money by Pink Floyd. I also in the same day heard Hegel H160 amp connected to Amphion speakers playing the same Money by Pink Floyd. The first system sounded musical, compulsive and exciting. When the track picked up the tempo my god the system surely indicated the sudden increase in tempo, I started thinking what this system would do to my music collection. As to the second system all sounded correct, very balanced, had all the hi fi niceties but for me it was so bland, I felt if I had to listen to this system for a certain period I would fall asleep...!
I would equate the term bland with tonal simplicity (versus rich or nuanced).Bland probably means lack of get up and go or PRaT in Naim speak!
Mike would agree with you on the Hegel in his amplifier show down. And Hegel has been the darling of the reviewers so it shows what real value they bring to the table.
Shows the only pair of ears you can trust are your own
I think @Romulus reported both with the HegelI would equate the term bland with tonal simplicity (versus rich or nuanced).
When talking about lack of PRaT, I would probably call that dull, borning, or sleepy.
Isn't the ATC waaaaaaaay pricier than the Hegel/Amphion-combo? It's like comparing a Rolls with a VW...In my experience judging amps only gains credulity when it is partnered with certain speakers and also it is a matter of subjective personal taste.
I heard the ATC SIA2-100 amp connected to ATC SCM40 speakers playing Money by Pink Floyd. I also in the same day heard Hegel H160 amp connected to Amphion speakers playing the same Money by Pink Floyd. The first system sounded musical, compulsive and exciting. When the track picked up the tempo my god the system surely indicated the sudden increase in tempo, I started thinking what this system would do to my music collection. As to the second system all sounded correct, very balanced, had all the hi fi niceties but for me it was so bland, I felt if I had to listen to this system for a certain period I would fall asleep...!
What is the 'boxem' purifiNot sure it’s the ‘best’ but I am very pleased with my boxem purifi.
They are made in Luxembourg the designer is French Purite sent me one to tryWhat is the 'boxem' purifi
Familiar with the purifii band but not boxem?
Parasound which is AB can’t hear any differenceHow you find the purifi amps. And what were you using previously?
Must be a bit disappointing if you didn’t get an improvement after the upgrade/swap over?Parasound which is AB can’t hear any difference
What is the 'boxem' purifi
Familiar with the purifii band but not boxem?