I didn't think I could possibly contribute anything to this thread but in the end I'll leave this here, valuable or not.
I'm relatively new to hi-fi. I bought my first system in 2020, which included a Naim NAP150/NAC112 pairing. I understand now this was maybe one of their worst outings, and I have since moved on, but nevermind, this won't be about amplification quality.
I landed on those Naim amps because the name came up a lot in my (pre-forums) research, and I could afford them. I didn't know about the upgrade ladder or anything. After buying and enjoying my system I started browsing forums more. I knew right away that the Naim forum wasn't for me: going further up the chain just wasn't a possibility, and that's what I saw a lot of there. PFM, on the other hand seemed more even-handed in its discussion and other brands were discussed too, so I joined.
OK, now to the point. As someone who did not know the history, who had no sense of "the company that was" vs the current incarnation, who had neither beef nor evangelism, I found that the meta-discussion around Naim is far more heated than any actual discussions about their products (Solstice excluded...). That seems like a major disconnect to me.
I felt that the majority of users who mentioned Naim products here or who answered questions simply didn't come across as evangelical fanboys or whatever. Just helpful people who enjoyed their systems from whatever Naim era, with or without mods, etc. What stood out most were the anti-Naim crowd who pounced whenever the company was discussed or who couldn't wait to make quips about stripping wall paper or tooth enamel, thus taking the discussion into the meta level. But even then, to be clear, that tends to be a limited few. Get past them and even the other critical members are perfectly reasonable in their discussion.