Ok thanks.I can check I may have a CDM-9 not a pro one of the wiser heads may be able to tell you. I think some components are interchangeable?
Ok thanks.I can check I may have a CDM-9 not a pro one of the wiser heads may be able to tell you. I think some components are interchangeable?
Ok thanks for that detailed reply....much obliged!As someone who has owned both the original CDI and CDS, here are my views.
As I recall, Julian Vereker said that the design of the player(s) was such that the disk needs to be lightly coupled to the transport drive in order to minimise vibrational noise transfer to the disk. Hence you have two versions of the puck: - one with 1 rubber ring and another with 3 rubber rings. The one rubber version sounds better because of the minimal contact points but they have a greater tendency to slip.
The ring on the transport should be black Nextel. Yours is different. Has it worn off or has the transport been replaced with a non-standard one? This is one of the problems of this CD player along with the rubber rings on the puck getting old and compressed. It is possible to rotate the rubber rings to improve things. Alternatively obtain a rubber hose with similar diameter and cut it into small rings and replace the old ones. I think you can obtain such hoses from bicycle tyre suppliers; they are used as a part in the pump sockets. I have no idea how to replace the Nextel layer on the transport. I've heard of people cutting a ring from a rubber sheet and gluing it to the transport but this sounds like a very poor solution.
If as you say, the CD player works with older CDs but not with newer ones, the problem may lie with the CDs themselves. These CD players were designed very closely to meet the original CD standard specs. Newer CDs tend to be all over the place with regard to the original CD specifications. In this case, they may be too thin.
I did not think that the newer pucks will work with this CD player but I may be wrong.
I loved these players but I gave up on them because of these problems. The CDS2 is much better in this area and the CDS3 even better.
I might give it all a wipe down with some isopropyl alcohol.
Oh ok....I meant the laser with the isopropyl....but might just not do any of that....Don't do that! You risk taking the coating off! Just use a slightly damp cotton bud, but be very careful, and don't go anywhere near the laser!
The clamp 5 arrived today but while its an improvement it still slips...
The clamp 5 arrived today but while its an improvement it still slips...
I have had it from new....Sounds like the rubber has possibly dried. You don’t know what the previous owner may have used to clean the rubber ring before, so it might have had a bad effect now. Might be an idea to buy some PlatenClene rubber restorer, and apply a *little’ to a cotton bud, and very lightly apply it around the rubber, applying gentle pressure only.
https://cpc.farnell.com/af-international/pcl100/rubber-platen-cleaner-platenclene/dp/SAPCL100
The clamp 5 puck usually does the trick (I came up with this one way back in the early 00’s over at diyaudio.com and it’s been used as a successful disc slip cure by many since then), so the rubber is likely perished and not gripping the disc.
I have had it from new....
I had a CDi & a CDX, not a massive difference between them IME, I would expect the CDX2 to sound great. If the player is fixable I believe Witch Hat do an interesting mod which allows it to take an off board power supply.I’ve tried double sided tape with no success...tape on the top of the cd, thin CDs, thick CDs, cleaning the nextel ring with cotton buds and water, new clamp 3, new clamp 5.....so I think I might send it off to which hat for them to look at.
So as I needed a player I have bought a cdx2....really don’t know what to expect but it has some big shoes to fill....
I had a CDi & a CDX, not a massive difference between them IME
Respectfully suggest that you need to have your ears cleaned out [
It was over 20 years ago so my hearing was probably better then