mjw
pfm Member
and it’s quite interesting - at least for a layman:
http://www.psaudio.com/article/cables-rca-interconnects/
http://www.psaudio.com/article/cables-rca-interconnects/
Worth a read when I get a day or two; not particularly well written, but could offer some insight. Not sure why it's all RCA, though; thought that was the termination.
and it’s quite interesting - at least for a layman:
http://www.psaudio.com/article/cables-rca-interconnects/
Worth a read when I get a day or two; not particularly well written, but could offer some insight. Not sure why it's all RCA, though; thought that was the termination.
So to sum it up, someone is talking through their bumhole.
But what are these "time domain distortions"? The interesting thing is that if one writes sciencey sounding advertising copy saying nothing very much but using the words "time-domain" then it is a proven fact that it sounds at least 37% more interesting to readers of advertising copy.At least they are trying to understand what they hypothesise might be causing audible effects in cables. Interesting that they think time domain distortions are significant.
Nic P
But but but .... what about the tertiary variables?
Just like this one!It's 100% total bollocks as every claim about cables is. Gobbledygook.
It's 100% total bollocks as every claim about cables is. Gobbledygook.
But RCA Phono plugs are much smaller so we can fit hundreds of them on the back of A/V receivers.
Imagine having a conversation about the superiority of a car designed in the 1940's.
XLR for me - end of.
well known. BIAS is why people hear differences in cablesAt least they are trying to understand what they hypothesise might be causing audible effects in cables. Interesting that they think time domain distortions are significant.
Nic P