clivem2
pfm Member
Apple gear is not permitted in my house. It's the work of the devil.So how are you people using the iPhone 5 in your hi-fi systems?
Apple gear is not permitted in my house. It's the work of the devil.So how are you people using the iPhone 5 in your hi-fi systems?
iPhone 4 streaming Spotify and 'Bugz' (Korean sporify) to airport express.
accurately but not sounding as good.
my ex mother-in-law wouldn't have any salt, pepper, sauces etc at the dinner table. it spoils the way it is supposed to be tasted she'd say. she couldn't get her head around that it may be true but it added something to the taste and made it more enjoyable.
Perhaps, but I've already said I don't care what it sounds like as long as I know it's accurate. Ditto with my food. In restaurants I don't add sauces or salt etc as I want to taste it as it left the kitchen, i.e as the cook intended me to taste it. As with food as with recordings.
Ah, so it's a content-less word. That I do understand. Thanks for the explanation.
S.
Serge,
But what if the pickles are a bit zingy and the mayo a bit dry? Or if the whole meal might benefit from being warmed up a bit?
Joe
Perhaps, but I've already said I don't care what it sounds like as long as I know it's accurate. Ditto with my food. In restaurants I don't add sauces or salt etc as I want to taste it as it left the kitchen, i.e as the cook intended me to taste it. As with food as with recordings.
S
No no no, it totally has "content" as a word when seen in its correct context, but this is what happens when a technical term from one discipline is appropriated and used out of context in another discipline, then it loses its content.
It would be like someone sonifying a bunch of Apple serial numbers and then calling it "serial music", i.e. the process of serialism is not inherent in the work. You have to nip such abuses in the bud otherwise people habitually misuse a term until it becomes part of the nomenclature (HiFi is already riddled with such ghastliness) and then it becomes part of mainstream language.
James Earl Jones voiced my amps.
Keith.
Serge,
I think I finally understand you, and I can respect the purist mind-set, but in a world where far too many burritos have been bean brickwalled up the wazoo I like to add some salsa and jalapenos to the mix to correct what the chef got wrong.
Joe
An amplifier that had no sound of its own doesn't exist. It is just some theoretical flight of fancy for objectivists rhetoric.
Unless you have a business reasoning for using objectism, trying to peddle this nonsense in an enthuasts community is a sophisticated form of trolling.
If the chef got it wrong with regard your taste.... Which brings us back full circle.
No, there is no room for personal preference. One is but an empty vessel waiting to be filled at the whim of the chef/engineer. One neither likes nor dislikes; one simply consumes.