Julf
Facts are our friends
Its latency thats the issue though, not throughput. Hence my point really.
WiFi shouldn't cause human-detectable latency, unless there is routing/DNS/DHCP issues involved.
Its latency thats the issue though, not throughput. Hence my point really.
Possibly off at a tangent here, but a long run in my house was done with Cat 5 cable, and on testing, the wireless shows double the speed of the Cat 5 (>200 Mbps vs <100 Mbps).
While we are on the subject, how come Cat 6 carries signals twice as fast as Cat 5. Wire is wire right?
Possibly off at a tangent here, but a long run in my house was done with Cat 5 cable, and on testing, the wireless shows double the speed of the Cat 5 (>200 Mbps vs <100 Mbps).
While we are on the subject, how come Cat 6 carries signals twice as fast as Cat 5. Wire is wire right?
Possibly off at a tangent here, but a long run in my house was done with Cat 5 cable, and on testing, the wireless shows double the speed of the Cat 5 (>200 Mbps vs <100 Mbps).
While we are on the subject, how come Cat 6 carries signals twice as fast as Cat 5. Wire is wire right?
Ethernet is always to be preferred as high frequency radiation is a known cause of health issues in the long run. So no WiFi in my home, nor DECT, bluethooth etc...
Ethernet is always to be preferred as high frequency radiation is a known cause of health issues in the long run. So no WiFi in my home, nor DECT, bluethooth etc...
Ethernet is always to be preferred as high frequency radiation is a known cause of health issues in the long run. So no WiFi in my home, nor DECT, bluethooth etc...
It does, but only if you wear a tin foil hat at all times.You're just making life hard for yourself unnecessarily. It's not going to make a blind bit of difference to your health.
No, I can´t configure. I didn´t see anything in the Nad settings.Also worth checking if you can configure a buffer size on the Nad, to see if that makes wifi usable.
Will ethernet connection to TV and laptop remove all buffering once and for all?