matthewr
spɹɐʍʞɔɐq spɹoɔǝɹ ɹnoʎ sʎɐld
Apparently not, they cannot be counted. This happens quite a bit where sources will express concerns or optimism based upon postal votes they've seen. If they gave more specifity then, yes, that would be illegal.
I only know this as once the froth has died down on twitter some people who actually know what they are talking about come to the surface.
If she has acted illegally then I cannot see how prosecution could be avoided.
I was referring to the people who looked at the votes rather than LK.