Seanm
pfm Member
The JCVI statement stressed that the direct health risks and benefits were very finely poised: not hard to see how even a very slightly wider or different remit would tip the balance the other way. And we shouldn't trivialise the consequences of disrupted schooling: if it were just a week on zoom in wouldn't matter but it's not - it's widespread, frequent disruption for an indefinite length of time, on the heels of two very difficult school years that have done children a lot of damage.You mean balance the risk of a heart inflammation with unknown long term consequences on the one hand, against the risk of having to do a week of school with zoom on the other?