Martyn Miles
pfm Member
Audio Space have registered a new company producing the LS3/5a. http://news.u-audio.com.tw/newsdetail.asp?newsid=2421 That will upset the purists... Martyn Miles .
.
The sound was slow with boomy, uncontrolled bass, veiled mids, lacking tranparancy and treble was very laid-back, lacking in detail, sparkle and attack.
The Sterling LS3/5a is the most dissapointing speaker I've heard to date.
(within my own room/system that is. It was not at all recognizable as an LS3/5a. (I had the chance to compare it with a Rogers 15ohm LS3/5a)
Perhaps it demanded a better/other amp (Naim Nait 5i).
The sound was slow with boomy, uncontrolled bass, veiled mids, lacking tranparancy and treble was very laid-back, lacking in detail, sparkle and attack.
Crazy things you read on the internet.
This is one of them.
Martin, Jodet
I read you loud and clear but Alco is no bomb thrower. Check out his posts. If he hears something there is a rational reason for his opinion. It would be interesting to read more details on the circumstances of his audition. Some of the characteristics detailed are not inconsistent with brand new speakers that have not broken in.
I read you loud and clear but Alco is no bomb thrower. Check out his posts. If he hears something there is a rational reason for his opinion. It would be interesting to read more details on the circumstances of his audition. Some of the characteristics detailed are not inconsistent with brand new speakers that have not broken in.
Aah yes...the Rogers Studio 3. Eventhough the Studio 3's weren't that highly regarded in the press I loved them.Alco had Rogers Studio 3s, as I did at the time. I recall we agreed on their sound
Aah yes...the Rogers Studio 3. Even though the Studio 3s weren't that highly regarded in the press I loved them.
I regret having sold them 3 years ago! (never seen a pair on the s/h market since!)