Fatcat,
Hmm ..OK i suppose the phrase 'naff all' was not the best one. After reading through your excellent reply I decided to go have a look and try to re-fill the hole that has obviously appeared in my memory banks. I think i'll take your word for it
![Wink ;) ;)]()
. It seems there are just too many variables, i also suppose that these variables are more important the lower the actual torque loading is, I mean things like the material the nut and bolt are made from, whether the threads are lubricated, what material is being clamped will depend on the amount of friction underneath the nut and bolt faces , etc, etc . Given its slippery surface you could actually exert more tension in a bolt that was clamping a plastic bodied cart and powder coated arm tube, than say a bare metal headshell and a metal bodied cart for the same indicated torque loading.
One thing i can say is that I have checked out my Rega torque tool using the calibrated strain guage at work and i know it too be pretty accurate, this torque loading definately didn't ' feel' safe when i was tightening mine up, which is why i didn't continue for even 1 click , let alone 4 ! Perhaps these sorts of figures are better suited to metal bodied carts.
i think that try to tighten equally and sensibly seem to be the order of the day, rather than doggedly go for a particular torque loading.
I did start to find this site interesting until i saw the large ugly formulae
Torquing stuff
Thanks for your advice anyway, mucho appreciated and something else to think about.
Regards
S&C