I just found it somewhat amusing/telling that the ex-public schoolboy with a latin username apparently assumes everyone who disagrees with their elitist right-wing establishment view of ‘sovereignty’ is a Stella-drinking chav. No anger in my post, it is just taking the piss.
I find your preoccupation with the fact that I attended a private school quite telling and prejudicial, loaded with plenty of assumptions of your own, most of them based on what it is quite clear you see as 'the Eton model'. I was the son of a publican (and went on to become one myself, in the outer reaches of London's East End), and my co-pupils included a large contingent of the sons of pretty humble west country dairy farmers for whom battered Landrovers were the standard mode of transport, together with a rich mish-mash of the sons and daughters of people in the armed and foreign services, and government ministers & civil servants (probably corrupt - the then Bangkok police chief managed to send two of his own and three of his sister's kids to the school) and the odd businessman from a wide range of Asian, Middle Eastern and African countries. Oddly, on reflection, I recall very few Europeans. But, with a few notable exceptions, we certainly didn't see ourselves as 'an elite', and most of our parents - bar those of the Asian, ME and East African contingents - were pretty impecunious.
My reference to Stella was flippant, and was largely a reference to a certain aggression, or as you refer to it, 'taking the piss'. I can get the Islay Malt thing, it carries a certain self-image of 'the thinking man'.
No, I’ve never suggested you were the kind of racist that would smash up Asian shops..
What kind of a racist
did you see me as then?
just the kind of person who’d turn a blind eye that their arguments enabled others to do so...
Of which more below..
You can not deny Brexit has vastly increased xenophobia, racism and racist violence.
That's a very complex matter. I would suggest that xenophobia and racism have always existed, and always will, in certain social layers in all societies - it is in fact a normal human response to perceived outside threat, and one to which the only plausible answers lie in the realms of parenthood and education. Brexit has become the focal point around which the so-called culture wars are being fought, in which the vote to leave the EU project itself has been delightedly leapt upon by the far left as a xenophobic act so pure that it has become in their minds a cipher for hatred, all of which is of course utter drivel, and appallingly divisive to boot. Survey after survey has shown that post-Brexit attitudes to immigration are by large measures positive, indeed amongst the most so in Europe and the west, even against a backdrop of record net immigration figures, and we live in a society which is by and large contentedly multiracial, from top to bottom. It isn't perfect, certainly, and there are clear issues around the apparently insoluble permeability of the borders increasingly stoking far-right sentiments not just here but across the west.
Some racist violence, e.g. the Rwanda refugee rendition scheme, coming directly from the Brexit-empowered Tory state itself.
I'm just as appalled as you are with this ugly obsession with Rwanda, and sadly, by the robotic Sunak himself - it promised much for this country to have a Hindu PM. I agree with much that you have to say elsewhere on this government, which is not conservative in any sense that I would understand it. It has though, again, nothing to do with Brexit per se. A number of EU countries, and indeed the EU itself, are actively considering similar schemes, though I recall that you have stated in the past that you would support such interventions (quasi-concentration camps in Libya etc) from the EU as it would be in your view 'democratic' and 'consensual'.
You again characterise Brexit as a 'Tory' project. It is worth reminding you again that EEC/EU membership was from the outset, and remained, an overwhelmingly tory undertaking. The left, for extremely valid democratic reasons, were traditionally opposed, and were only enticed to the party by Delorsian assurances of a 'social Europe'.
The demonisation and scapegoating of ‘others’ was always the core selling point and you willingly backed that side. I called it out at the time, and I call it out now. From the very start Brexit was sold as a far-right racist/nationalist project even if the underlying reason was to protect elite crown tax havens and oligarch money-laundering schemes.
This 'fellow travellers' trope is one of the most ugly and insidious employed by the EUphile far left, and you do it constantly. It isn't just that it wilfully ignores the anti-immigrant antics of the EU itself, it is worse still. It is a fallback position of those who cannot tolerate dissent from their own point of view, yet have no coherent argument of their own - you have no coherent response to my case against the EU institutions, so default to abuse, misrepresentation and namecalling. There's a word for it in the English language, and it isn't a pretty one. I don't think that easy resort to it does you any favours.