Arkless Electronics
Trade: Amp design and repairs.
Sinatra at The Sands. One of my fave albums of all time and very favourite live album.
The only live rock album that comes close to anything by The Who for me is King Crimson's The Great Deceiver set. Monumental and far better than the more cursory USA, my vinyl copy of which sounds a bit thin is comparison.
Mad stuff that I had forgotten how terrific an album this is. Listened to it over the weekend I remember when I cried on hearing of Bon Scotts passing. The next time I cried was when I first heard his replacement, Brian Johnson. They were tears borne out of disappointment. Lost interest in AC/DC after thatAnd AC/DC “If You Want Blood”
A terrific album. I remember buying it the day of its release, sticking it on the TT and being completely blown away. Your comment on the cd not capturing the same sound, I agree with. Indeed I find it difficult to name too many rock recordings of that era that impressed when transferred to the digital domain. Right now I am listening to Purple's Made in Japan and doing an A/B between the much sought after Hoffman remastered CD and the 'Porky' vinyl cut. The vinyl kicks the CD into touch very easily.It's been mentioned in many previous threads but Thin Lizzy's "Live & Dangerous" is widely cited as one of the best live albums (as far as rock music goes anyway.) John Peel certainly championed it when it came out and he'd mostly moved on to other types of music in his show by then.
The producer Tony Visconti claimed that a lot of the quality came from studio overdubs to the extent that these were almost studio re-created recordings played over live crowd ambience, but the band always claimed they just re-touched a few fluffed guitar solos. Since both parties would like to have credit for one of the most successful live albums ever its not a surprise that there is a conflict of opinion. It matters little to me as my first ever gig was seeing them at Lewisham Odeon during that tour and the double LP I bought when it came out was then and still is an instant time machine back to that night for my ears. The CD copy I also have now somehow doesn't capture the same sound for me, so it appears to have lost some of the excitement in the re-mastering for reasons I can't put my finger on.
There is another Thin Lizzy live recording more recently released called "Still Dangerous" from a tour in the US around the same time as "L&D", with guitarist Scott Gorham presiding over the prodution, which to me sounds remarkably similar to "Live & Dangerous" and, as I've said before, suggests to me that maybe Visconti's work on "L&D" wasn't quite as extensive as he claimed.
It's been mentioned in many previous threads but Thin Lizzy's "Live & Dangerous" is widely cited as one of the best live albums (as far as rock music goes anyway.) John Peel certainly championed it when it came out and he'd mostly moved on to other types of music in his show by then.
The producer Tony Visconti claimed that a lot of the quality came from studio overdubs to the extent that these were almost studio re-created recordings played over live crowd ambience, but the band always claimed they just re-touched a few fluffed guitar solos. Since both parties would like to have credit for one of the most successful live albums ever its not a surprise that there is a conflict of opinion. It matters little to me as my first ever gig was seeing them at Lewisham Odeon during that tour and the double LP I bought when it came out was then and still is an instant time machine back to that night for my ears. The CD copy I also have now somehow doesn't capture the same sound for me, so it appears to have lost some of the excitement in the re-mastering for reasons I can't put my finger on.
There is another Thin Lizzy live recording more recently released called "Still Dangerous" from a tour in the US around the same time as "L&D", with guitarist Scott Gorham presiding over the prodution, which to me sounds remarkably similar to "Live & Dangerous" and, as I've said before, suggests to me that maybe Visconti's work on "L&D" wasn't quite as extensive as he claimed.