seethroughyou
pfm Member
It could just make ‘baubles’ that aren’t foo.
Keith
Knowing audiophiles, you can sell them anything as long as you could spin a tale about it and then publish it in a bauble magazine or get some bauble reviewer on a forum to wax lyrical about how it’s just more visual and how it lifts a veil so you can see so many more colours and how it’s engineered from unobtainium and how this bauble is fashioned in 1 inch thick anodised aluminium and how it comes with a stack of 3 other baubles that work in system synergy but that you can’t appreciate the bauble straightaway, no Sir it needs a burn in lasting just enough time to surpass your return for a full refund and that you must ‘live with it’ to really appreciate it on your Xmas tree for a few weeks. The bauble has been around for over a hundred years but yet again this year someone who works in their garage has now found a new technology to better last year’s bauble and continues to do so every year that surpass the latest and greatest bauble. This breakthrough in bauble technology can be viewed at this year’s bauble show over a beard, pie and ale. Everything from stars, blackholes, cells, pharmacology, quantum computing engineering etc...thrives and aims for the highest hierarchy of hypothesis testing preferably at the gold standard of heavily replicated randomised double blind control trials, yet audiophiles think audio reproduction of Nora Jones or DSOM is beyond bias and cohort correction because there is something illusive, magical and incomprehensible. Finally, if you disagree that the bauble is not better and worth the 5 figure price, then you must be a nasty objectivist troller and should be packed off to the local psych ward under section 3 of the mental health act or worse still, have your post wiped by the moderator who knows best when it comes to policing free speech.