What panels do you have? Perhaps not specifically the LRS?
If I recall the best results with the old MG-1's were with the Croft pre/power - now on paper the Croft should not cut it at 40 watts p/c - but it's worth trying later on ... Meanwhile after unpacking them and setting them up with the Yam 801 then shifting them about all over the place I have run out of steam.
I did take a good while choosing my regular speakers - perhaps that paid off and they are good enough to compete well with these panels ...
Perhaps they need bedding in for a while?
Where do they fall short in your opinion after this short try?
Even in the box they look good..........
Have got Maggie 1.7 i .Have had them about a year now and they still give me wow ! moments.I just can't fault them they sound so natural and the sound is like a performance in the lounge.
Sometimes I think you can hear so into the mix on a track with regard instruments as their separation is astonishing and transient speed.
Sorry can't offer much advice on amps with the LRS.
Del Monaco could advice more.
I'm allowed to add this to this thread - the last piece of Hi-Fi I just purchased just now from eBay is as a HEGEL 190 - especially for the LRS. I can't be left wondering if the Yamaha is good enough - best be certain - the used price was very good so I jumped. Maggie dealers say that the Hegel is a good match.
I'm quite looking forward to it!!
They sound great. Currently I prefer the Graham more than the Harbeth (LS5/9). Perhaps the smaller box is a better fit to the smallish room. It sounds more like a Harbeth 30.2 but is less restrained ie. more open in the midrange and treble, perhaps with slightly better nuance and detail as well.Even in the box they look good..........
I also prefer Graham speakers to the Harbeth in general as they have that little sweetness many other speakers don’t have and they don’t bring any listener fatigue on long listening sessions.They sound great. Currently I prefer the Graham more than the Harbeth (LS5/9). Perhaps the smaller box is a better fit to the smallish room. It sounds more like a Harbeth 30.2 but is less restrained ie. more open in the midrange and treble, perhaps with slightly better nuance and detail as well.
Not that new, I bought it a few months ago but I finally got round to fitting the IQ Audio rosewood plinth to my LP12 the other day;
Thanks to Iain, @Woodwrangler for the plinth, all went without a hitch & it looks stunning.
Also thanks to Colin, @Mr Pig for remembering I was looking for a plinth when these became available & for the help & comprehensive advice on set up. I'm very happy with my bounce & cable dressing.
TS
I also prefer Graham speakers to the Harbeth in general as they have that little sweetness many other speakers don’t have and they don’t bring any listener fatigue on long listening sessions.
No problem at all Iain. If you want any more pics just let me know.That looks very nice Tony would you mind if I show off your setup to friends
Agreed. This comment may ruffle some feathers. Even though I only had a short stint with the Grahams, plonk and play with little optimisation vs. 13 years with the Harbeth painstakingly optimised, I am finding the Graham to be more accurate and truthful to the source or recording. The midrange is clearer with more detail and nuance coming through. With the Harbeth, vocals sound a little smeared as if some processing was added. With the Graham it is clean and pure..I also prefer Graham speakers to the Harbeth in general as they have that little sweetness many other speakers don’t have and they don’t bring any listener fatigue on long listening sessions.