Could you please say a few words about each power amplifier, especially comparing their sound quality? ThanksReintroduced the Musical Fidelity P170 power amplifier in the kit (bottom shelf) and can’t decide between it and the NAP 110 which one will stay..............
I was looking to buy one so John from next door offered to lend me his while away on hols, it’s just had the Karousel bearing fitted by Robbie. Never owned one before, a Linn/Naim dealer pissed me off when I went to trade my RD80/Rogers for an LP12/Nait1 so I've never looked at Linn in 40 years, until curiosity peaked in lockdown and I bought an old Wakonda Pre/LK Power.Didn't think you had an LP12 Angus. When did that arrive?
I have more TTsNot a bad set up....... But I'm deducting points because you should have an idler drive turntable too. On the other hand I do love Martin Logans..... so lets say 8/10.
Well, that’s what these forums are for so :Could you please say a few words about each power amplifier, especially comparing their sound quality? Thanks
I think your comment is bang on, the Naim seams to have more rythme so I may have misused the expression PRaT and should have said they have similar punch and energy instead.If you think a P170 compares to a NAP110, rhythmically, you don’t understand rhythm, or there is something seriously wrong with the 110.
Just like the "... you can always locate a subwoofer myth" I've always found ML's supposed integration problems to be complete BS (unless you are sitting on top of them) The only reason I dont own a pair of older Logans today is that the electrostatic elements wear out and are very expensive to replace. I have a knackered pair in storage as testament to this.I have more TTs
The Logans are right up my street, I’m not hearing any of their supposed integration weaknesses or at least it’s not bothering me and the Anthem ARC EQ works very well to sort out the Bass issues in the room.
There are usually panels on eBay, mine would be about a £Grand each but hopefully they will not be required for a long time yet, only had the Logans for 4 years.Just like the "... you can always locate a subwoofer myth" I've always found ML's supposed integration problems to be complete BS (unless you are sitting on top of them) The only reason I dont own a pair of older Logans today is that the electrostatic elements wear out and are very expensive to replace. I have a knackered pair in storage and testament to this.
Are you listening to them firing straight down rather than toed in?I have more TTs
The Logans are right up my street, I’m not hearing any of their supposed integration weaknesses or at least it’s not bothering me and the Anthem ARC EQ works very well to sort out the Bass issues in the room.
I bought a lovely SME 3012 a few weeks ago to use with my SP10 which had been lurking unused under the bed for the last year.
I thought the 3012 would fit fine on my plinth which had no armboard but had a cut-out for my SME V-12. Unfortunately it wouldn’t align due to the incorrect pivot to spindle distance for the 3012 and the limited back and forth movement thanks to the modified base on the 3012.
A big shout out to Lee Drage at Acoustand Audio who came to my rescue. I don’t particularly like the plinth and didn’t want to spend too much making it fit the 3012. Lee fitted a gorgeous armboard and resprayed the plinth as it was looking tatty. As you can see, he did a lovely job and for a very reasonable price. I couldn’t be happier with it.
Thanks also to Johnny at Audio Origami who rewired the arm for me after a clumsy moment.
It’s been an adventure but I finally got it up and running today. Very pleased. It’s sounding good.
Wow, that’s fantastic. Congrats! What were you using before? How would you rate it?
What were you using before?
I bought a lovely SME 3012 a few weeks ago to use with my SP10 which had been lurking unused under the bed for the last year.
I thought the 3012 would fit fine on my plinth which had no armboard but had a cut-out for my SME V-12. Unfortunately it wouldn’t align due to the incorrect pivot to spindle distance for the 3012 and the limited back and forth movement thanks to the modified base on the 3012.
When the dealer did the initial room measurements and installed them they had them toed in about 5 degrees. Since then the system has changed umpteen times and I’ve added the Townsend bases, now I have them firing straight ahead, it gives me the presentation I prefer. The layout and room aren’t ideal however it actully measures pretty well, life got in the way of our house plans, overall I’m very happy with the sound I’m getting, defo my favourite and the best speakers I’ve had in 40 years.Are you listening to them firing straight down rather than toed in?
Paul that plinth is stunning, it visually complements the design of the Lockwoods very nicely. How are you finding the sound of older SME arm vs the V?Thank you. The SP10 / SME 3012 series II / Kiseki Purpleheart is my spare deck. I have to say I rate it highly. I've been listening to it all night and I can't fault it. I'm really very pleased with it. Next year I hope to be able to afford an Ortofon SPU to put on the 3012. The SP10, 3012, SPU is a classic combo.
My main deck is a Sony TTS-8000 / SME V-12 / Phasemation PP-500 in a plinth made by Acoustand Audio.