When I read posts that are very overly critical of very expensive audio equipment, I sometimes wonder about motivation.
Most here seem to object to high prices in general, and that's fine. There are some very valid reasons for being skeptical. We all have different views on what constitutes good value for money.
For some, the pricing of luxury goods presents a moral issue. I have no problem with that, as long as the critics are consistent (e.g., Naim shouldn't produce an expensive TT, but neither should Linn, SME, and so on). For others, the criticism seems more of a knee-jerk reaction. Naim clearly remains a popular target for some here.
Strictly as a thought exercise, I do wonder at what point the purchase of a $20K TT becomes (for lack of a better word) ordinary. I wonder what income (for younger audiophiles) or net worth (for older audiophiles) would position such a purchase as affordable or perhaps even routine.
I am glad to see Naim continuing to find ways to survive. Anything that keeps them and their distributors in business is a good thing for those of us who need service from time to time. Personally, am all set for decks right now, and have little interest in purchasing the Solstice package. But I am curious about Naim's new direction for phono stages (e.g., how they compare to the Superline with different PS's), and I am also curious whether or not the new ARO could work on my TD-124 Mk 1. Was leaning towards a GrooveMaster II as a modern tonearm alternative to my Ortofon RMG-212.
Always fun to dream!