We currently have bigger things to worry about than sacking people for making innuendo comments ....
The point is that secret bad behavior can be used to blackmail MPs for influence.
Is Kim Jong-un or the FSB pumping some weird gas into The Houses of Parliament do you think? Our government is an international laughingstock.
It's worth remembering that some behaviour that might be considered harassment or demeaning to women is entirely legal. Hence the need for political parties and the HoC to have good internal processes in place to handle allegations of this nature.The problem woth a lot of this is real sexual assault, sexual harassment or bullying is getting blurred with certain sexual or relationship preferences etc between consenting adults. The former needs dealing with to the full extent of the law, the latter is only an issue if the party in question displays rank hypocrisy (e.g. John Majors sanctimonious family values bullshit whilst having affair with Edwina Curry) or attempts to do it whilst on the clock/public expenses (Liam Fox Adam Werrity etc). Other than that I have no interest in affairs, sexual kinks etc, that is their private time and none of our business. The leaked Tory list very much blurs this line, but that needs to be viewed as how the party chooses to blackmail/control its MPs, i.e. the contents of the list isnt the interesting thing here, it is how the party itself behaves.
It's worth remembering that some behaviour that might be considered harassment or demeaning to women is entirely legal. Hence the need for political parties and the HoC to have good internal processes in place to handle allegations of this nature.
Why do people not just respect other people, regardless of gender? When you recall some advertisements in the sixties and seventies, they make you cringe.
Probably.
Probably. I bought Polaroid sunglasses in the sixties, the better to see bikini-clad young women underwater, but age brings wisdom, as well as impotence.
The problem woth a lot of this is real sexual assault, sexual harassment or bullying is getting blurred with certain sexual or relationship preferences etc between consenting adults. The former needs dealing with to the full extent of the law, the latter is only an issue if the party in question displays rank hypocrisy (e.g. John Majors sanctimonious family values bullshit whilst having affair with Edwina Curry) or attempts to do it whilst on the clock/public expenses (Liam Fox Adam Werrity etc). Other than that I have no interest in affairs, sexual kinks etc, that is their private time and none of our business. The leaked Tory list very much blurs this line, but that needs to be viewed as how the party chooses to blackmail/control its MPs, i.e. the contents of the list isnt the interesting thing here, it is how the party itself behaves.
Probably. I bought Polaroid sunglasses in the sixties, the better to see bikini-clad young women underwater, but age brings wisdom, as well as impotence.
Good post. At what point does 'you look good - fancy a drink later - I find you good company' become harassment.
How did they stay on your head underwater?
Who has said it is?
Good post. At what point does 'you look good - fancy a drink later - I find you good company' become harassment.
Good post. At what point does 'you look good - fancy a drink later - I find you good company' become harassment.
Good post. At what point does 'you look good - fancy a drink later - I find you good company' become harassment.