Joe. Wait. So you mean The Madness Of King George III...Sorry to go all nerd here but it’s called Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) because the infectious respiratory illness was first identified in 2019. It’s not the 19th coronavirus discovered.
Edit: D’oh, I skipped the page where others mentioned the same thing. However, if you didn’t know this …. Yikes!
Joe
Whilst this is an absolutely valid point it’s important to note that we currently have little idea what the virus is doing because we have ended almost all relevant monitoring measures. The virus in its many forms has placed many people into a scenario where reduced immunity is inevitable and thus hospitalisations and deaths from flu etc. may also be causally associated. Undoubtedly we’re anecdotally not where we were 4 years ago but nor are we “out of the woods” or at some kind of end point.Also keep in mind that the virus circulating now is not the one that was circulating when the pandemic was declared. Have people forgotten that at its peak in the US alone COVID was killing more people a day than had died in the 9-11 terrorist attacks?
Joe
Certainly don’t hate Boris or conservatives in general on principle, but more than seriously unimpressed with their behaviour that certainly cost many lives. Absolutely no idea where ‘what would Corbyn have done’ takes the argument about what actually happened and whether lockdown was worth it.
There's a 'credible' in that sentence that is a bit of a tell.It’s a case of people being quick to criticise but without credible alternatives. Easy to do in hindsight and / or when not in the hot seat
I don't think people would have listened to him.Corbyn may or may not have done that, but he couldn’t have been worse….
If he'd have been in power, they would voted for him, though. This is what happens when you start with 'what if' scenarios rather than engaging with the argument. And anyway, plenty of people who didn't vote for Johnson or his party, followed the advice despite being convinced he is a rogue and an idiot.I don't think people would have listened to him.
Especially as they didn't vote for him.
I'm as sure as I can be that Corbyn would have tried his absolute hardest to keep as many people alive as possible. He's almost obsessed with other people's (and animals) well-being. It's been his lifelong mission to reduce suffering and save lives.. There's no way in hell he'd have missed, even a single COBRA meeting.I’ll stop here because we are out of my comfort zone of science and into politics.
In this case though, the credible alternatives would have been:
1. Turn up to COBRA meetings
2. Listen to the experts and follow the advice
3. Don‘t lie about following the advice
Corbyn may or may not have done that, but he couldn’t have been worse….
Indeed. And I'm pretty confident he'd have produced financial support for the hardest-affected and the self-employed rather than setting arbitrary thresholds so that some had to sink or swim.I'm as sure as I can be that Corbyn would have tried his absolute hardest to keep as many people alive as possible. He's almost obsessed with other people's (and animals) well-being. It's been his lifelong mission to reduce suffering and save lives.. There's no way in hell he'd have missed, even a single COBRA meeting.
I'm as sure as I can be that Corbyn would have tried his absolute hardest to keep as many people alive as possible. He's almost obsessed with other people's (and animals) well-being. It's been his lifelong mission to reduce suffering and save lives.. There's no way in hell he'd have missed, even a single COBRA meeting.
It’s a case of people being quick to criticise but without credible alternatives. Easy to do in hindsight and / or when not in the hot seat.
I must confess that I try to avoid name calling with regard to politicians as it tends to distract from more important discussions about policy and process. In this instance though I think you have been gentle. The man is not a rogue or an idiot in any sense. He is a proven recidivist liar and an acute opportunist of the highest order. The deliberate hair ruffles; the bumbling speech patterns etc. His actions may have been idiotic in terms of how they were driven by personal ideology rather than evidence based etc. but let‘s not kid ourselves there is anything of the idiot or rogue about him.he is a rogue and an idiot.
I looked up the data for the UK, Coronavirus Cases: 24,898,914 ; Deaths: 232,112 ; Recovered: 22,954,691.
I can only assume the other 33 million just didn’t bother getting tested as even I doubt anyone avoided it so actually over 67m recovered. It was most likely employed adults getting tested, children probably less likely and self employed people don’t get ill!
Don't get me wrong, Joe, I wasn't anti-lockdown. People I knew and loved were dying. A friend who had retired from a long career in nursing went back to work, and was traumatised by what was happening in the hospital. I was as nervous as hell, but I had to just get on with it. It sounds very cold, and I don't mean it to, but businesswise it was a bonanza.eternumviti,
That’s part of the reason why SARS-CoV-2 was such a public health nightmare. It caused mild symptoms in some — so mild they didn’t even suspect they were infected — but acute respiratory failure in others. The people with mild symptoms often didn’t see the point of lockdowns, while those in hospitals on ventilators wish others had seen the point.
Joe
No faffing or spaffing around.What would that have translated to in practice? Longer, stricter lockdowns?