Thanks to my mate
@RustyB, the wayward woofer is now back to full health. As a precaution for the other one, which I think could let go with a jolt, I've applied a bead of epoxy resin around the top and bottom junction of the ferrite ring. If the original adhesive should fail, at least I hope the epoxy will keep it aligned. They have been playing music now for two days, and here are my impressions:
First, the tonal balance is better balanced with a nicely weighted bottom end. I know it's hard to imagine how an XO change could effect that, but it does. I suspect the relativity of MF and HF levels have been corrected. I can now pull the NS-1000Ms slightly further into the room, where it produces superbly articulate and tuneful bass. It won't go much lower than 40Hz, but that's plenty of reach for mid-bass punch that you can feel.
Second, the edginess of the upper mid and slight tendency to exaggerate sibilance is completely gone. Whether it is due to better caps or more accurate crossover filters I can't tell. But it is a revelation to have hear-through transparency without the uncomfortable edge that I sometimes anticipate, and try to ameliorate with my class-A amp. They sound even better now with class-AB Densen amps. I have yet to try it with my class-A just now.
Third, voices and acoustic instruments sound more organic with better body and definition. It also seems easier to differentiate
ppp from
fff levels that coexist in a mix. There's a palpability that produces an immersive listening experience. I knew NS-1000Ms are special, but I have never heard them sound this good.
Now, I realise there may be some expectation bias. But I know when something sounds right. The Troels Gravesen upgrade makes the venerable Yamahas sound more right than I really expected. If anyone wants to treat their NS-1000Ms to a hell of an upgrade, you won't need to look further. Just remember not to jolt the ancient woofers and dislodge the magnet.
You have been warned.