But: would you be happy if your barber cut your hair drastically shorter on one side to the other?...
Just a thought to ponder
Hifi should please the ears, not the eyes!
But: would you be happy if your barber cut your hair drastically shorter on one side to the other?...
The difference is more likely to be in the tone density, texture and timbre of the music, creating aberrations from one channel to the other (where there is a short and long cables). Thats if your speakers sensitive enough, anything less than 95dB and you wont hear it.
WTF is "tone density, texture and timbre of the music"!!?
Meaningless.
Chris
Hi Chris, see posts 25 & 26...
Perceived wisdom tells us that they should be of equal length but does it really make a difference?
Is the transmission speed so fast as to make any cable length negligible?
How is the cable LRC affected - is it measureable? is it audible?
How much of "they must be equal" is a marketing ploy to generate sales?
Any experience greatly appreciated
I would expect this to be one of those "Polar" discussions
I experimented with moving my speakers at Christmas one being 8 metres and the other 4 metres from the amps. To make up the longer length I needed I twisted together two 4 metre lengths of exposure and taped it. Because the exposure cable only had plugs at the amp end one length had to be in opposite directionality. So I have a jury rigged 8m length of Exposure one side and 4m of Naim the other. Sounds great.