If it wasn't for the high running costs I'd have kept the Mazda as a spare car as from a straightforward value perspective I didn't get much more for it as a trade in that it'd cost to change the tyres on my C-class to the Michelin CrossClimate+'s.
I am tempted to get another 4x4 though - one that's cheaper to run. My son has been pestering me to upgrade his Fiesta to one of the new Suzuki Jimny's so it's possible something like that might happen.
I'd do this if I had a car with RFTs, I don't think it's a good solution, 50 miles will not always get you home. The last puncture I had was 100 miles from home at 7pm in the winter. Fitting a space saver on the M1 and driving 100 miles at 50 was a chore but better than finding a 24 hour tyre service to replace it at vast cost after a 2 hour wait.The winter tyres are not RFT's, I bought a spacesaver kit with jack and breaker bar. Takes up boot space, but worth it I think.
Yes my thought too. I also want to move away from the RFT for the summer, will certainly improve the ride.
It's easy to tell whether a fancy car is owned by someone who appreciates driving or just wants their mates to know they have a nice car: Just look at the tyres. I've lost count of the number of Porsches, BMWs and Mercs fitted with LingLongs, Triangles and other sh!tty black donuts pretending to be sports tyres.[/QUOTE
...like Yoko 032Rs on a 7