Paul R
pfm Member
I'm not a collector but I've dabbled. When dabbling I used Audacity to equalise and adjust effective speed. This does become a maze of tiny passages. I do have a 12" single sided recording of Caruso that is pre war. Great War that is. There's something profound about that direct mechanical connection from the sound in the room then to the movement of the stylus now. Then it goes digital and some of the mystique disappears.What I meant was, were you a collector of early 78s, you'd soon find that not all were actually cut at 78rpm.
Played at 78rpm, early Caruso (68 to 70rpm), for example, would sound like a castrato; this before we take into consideration that there were no standards for recording equalization.
The 78.26 thing is a useful confirmation that the speed measuring technique I've been messing with is working a bit. I hadn't noticed that it was the notional 'standard'. My aim is to look at variations while actually playing a record at quite a fine resolution. The average rpm just falls out. Anyway we'll see.