well it must be true then if he says so
for further entertainment & delight
http://www.badscience.net/?p=201#more-201
for further entertainment & delight
http://www.badscience.net/?p=201#more-201
Russ Andrews Oak Cone feet on a Shoebox Naim
- Thread starter James N
- Start date
Ive tried them, and prefer the sound with them in place. You might prefer otherwise, but unless you try it how will you know? 60 day money bacg guarantee. What have you got to lose?
FYI Russ Andrewa/Kimber cable from wall socket to loud speakers and Oak Cones under everything
I assume you still use a wind up gramophone then? After all, whats the point of looking for improvements if you are hapy with what you have got?
all I have been saying is I just think you should look for improvements elsewhere
add up the cost of everything you bought from companies (ie Russ Andrews et al) & put that toward some equipment changes
PS you are not far off the mark with your comment on the gramophone ~ I'm looking but not found better yet.
add up the cost of everything you bought from companies (ie Russ Andrews et al) & put that toward some equipment changes
PS you are not far off the mark with your comment on the gramophone ~ I'm looking but not found better yet.
I love RA's assertion that the energy absorbed does not end up as heat. Erm...where does the energy go then? If the laws of physics are unchanged since I did my studies it can't just disappear into the material. OK, the heat isn't detectable, that's because sound is a rubbish way of transmitting energy and heat is a very effective way of soaking it up. As for the squash ball analogy and suggesting that there is no heat generated, RA has clearly not picked up a distinctly warm squash ball after 2 people have been leathering it against a wall for a few minutes.
I'm just going off to review my Peter Belt collection and count the pages of the books on my shelves.
I'm just going off to review my Peter Belt collection and count the pages of the books on my shelves.