Heckyman
pfm Member
So I think what I’m hearing is that there’s no inherent technical reason why a HAT DAC would sound better ( or I suppose worse) than a USB DAC.
it all depends upon design, implementation and the chipset used.
Yes, more or less...
Not quite your original question but since the Pi2aes was mentioned upthread, there are actually 2 broad categories of i2s interface: short distance i2s (for internal connections such as RPi to hat), and long distance i2s (for connections to external DACs).
To give an example, my (external) DAC has 4 inputs: i2s (RJ45), SPDIF (AES / BNC), USB, optical.
"all things being equal" (!) the quality according to the designer goes in the order mentioned above. However, almost no sources currently available today output that particular flavour of i2s! The Pi2aes does actually come close and could probably be made to work with some re-wiring. BUT, is a $150 streamer over i2s going to sound better than say, the dCS Network Bridge over SPDIF or a state of the art server via USB? Just because of the type of connection? No-one can say until they tried it, but I doubt it. It's not just the connection method that matters. For example, how has the interface has been done internally in the device? It may be that everything comes off the USB bus anyway before being routed to the other outputs. In such a case there would be no advantage to i2s.