Yes I also think the OP will be OK.Yes, it will work fine with other preamps - its solid stafe so not lke teh previous FM1 and 2 that needed a minimum 100K input impedance on the preamp.
Ho ho! Wherever you site it, there shouldn't be a solid surface (wall?) behind. Free space only. Lots of tuners work on pieces of string but to get the best s.q. capable from the tuner it needs to be adequately loaded, which usually is visible even with the crudest of signal meters.
Yes I also think the OP will be OK.
However, looking at the FM3 schematics via the link in post #22 I see that for later serial numbered FM3s there's just a 0.1 µF output coupling capacitor. To stop the bass rolling off too early, the 47 kΩ input impedance (I think) of the Naim 32.5 the OP mentions looks just about good enough. Earlier serial numbers do not look like they are impacted like this, but later ones probably need 47 kΩ minimum and 100 kΩ might be a little better in this particular way.
This effect happens with the FM4 as well. See https://www.audiomisc.co.uk/QuadFM4/FM4.html.
The 4 pin din plugs are only used for the output link twixt 33 and power amp (such as 303)Some Quad gear is 4 pin DIN, I think the 33-303 are such. FM3 also I think, but I would have to check. You may therefore need a 4 pin to 5 pin lead. Not a biggie, but needed.
I think that's OK - it will certainly work but perhaps you might perceive radio stations as a bit bass-light from that particular combination. It's just a theoretical observation based on looking at the FM3 schematic and @martin clark may disagree with me.Hi there John, thanks for your input.
Re-thinking things: it's gonna be used with my Arcam alpha 3, 2nd system up in bedroom/ as pic. ...
FM3 is shown as having 5 pin 180 degrees DIN on the schematics
Pin 1 Mono
Pin 2 Ground
Pin 3 Left
Pin 4 Not Used
Pin 5 Right
Not mine Captain. Someone else's aerial maybe, as I've not posted pic's. Advantageous to have an antenna as high as poss, which is usually a chimney. A mast further increases height. For coax, CT whatever (100?) (so-called computer cable?) is the stuff to use. There was a thread with handy suggestions on here not so long ago.B b but the picture of your aerial shows it up tethered to a chimney. I'm a bit confused by this!
Not mine Captain. Someone else's aerial maybe, as I've not posted pic's. Advantageous to have an antenna as high as poss, which is usually a chimney. A mast further increases height. For coax, CT whatever (100?) (so-called computer cable?) is the stuff to use. There was a thread with handy suggestions on here not so long ago.
Any array on a chimney will be affixed to a mast (which is strapped to the chimney) which takes it well above chimney pot level, hence free space. Solid surfaces behind aerials are a no-no.whose website picture showed it on a chimney. Which I guess is effectively a wall behind it? ( that being my point).
Yuk! If you want max. performance, you don't try to get away with anything. Think the Captain is some way away from the TX (can't find mention here) so a proper 75 ohm (exterior preferably) aerial would be required, I'd think.if you are close enough to the transmitter tower you may get away with an indoor 300-ohm ribbon into a 300 – 75-ohm Balun Adaptor,
@Jim Audiomisc thanks also for your contribution. Welsh small valley here, although I'm perched twds top of my village, I have two valley sides close by. One side kinda interrupting a clear line to my (160m high) TX on the coast.
Btw is your avatar from J. Carpenter's The Thing?
Capt