James
Lord of the Erg\o/s
Richard,
"Have you looked at the mids with a built in enclosure? Peerless M 122 for example? US$36.85 from Madisound."
It's not so much the added complexity of building a separate chamber for the mid that's the issue, but rather what I can do a little different this time around. At first, it was going to be the use of a limited band-width dome mid, but I've thought better of it. And rather than design and build yet another closed-box 3-way system, I thought a partial dipole could be fun.
That way, I can more easily change the shape and size of the mid/tweet baffle and not have to rebuild a new box for every iteration of the PFM-Special.
James
PSSST: One of the reasons for going dipole is an opportunity for me to use the primo Seas Excel M15CH001 driver that I had hoped, but failed to, retrofit onto my E-IIIs. This shares the same chassis as the MCA15RCY and should be a direct swap pending minor filter changes. The beauty of the M15 is the tiny motor system and open back design, which means it should excel in a dipole application. However, it is not cheap by any stretch of the imagination and time will tell if it is worth the extra money for PFMers wanting a little bit more performance. Heck, I might even swap in a Scan-speak tweeter or two that I have in my drawer of spares.
"Have you looked at the mids with a built in enclosure? Peerless M 122 for example? US$36.85 from Madisound."
It's not so much the added complexity of building a separate chamber for the mid that's the issue, but rather what I can do a little different this time around. At first, it was going to be the use of a limited band-width dome mid, but I've thought better of it. And rather than design and build yet another closed-box 3-way system, I thought a partial dipole could be fun.
That way, I can more easily change the shape and size of the mid/tweet baffle and not have to rebuild a new box for every iteration of the PFM-Special.
James
PSSST: One of the reasons for going dipole is an opportunity for me to use the primo Seas Excel M15CH001 driver that I had hoped, but failed to, retrofit onto my E-IIIs. This shares the same chassis as the MCA15RCY and should be a direct swap pending minor filter changes. The beauty of the M15 is the tiny motor system and open back design, which means it should excel in a dipole application. However, it is not cheap by any stretch of the imagination and time will tell if it is worth the extra money for PFMers wanting a little bit more performance. Heck, I might even swap in a Scan-speak tweeter or two that I have in my drawer of spares.