advertisement


New Rega Nd7 Moving Magnet cartridge

Of course the Exact sounds better than the stock AT3600L. The Exact has a nude line contact stylus while the 3600 has a bonded conical stylus (albeit a very nice one). Try the 3600 with an aftermarket line contact stylus like the one I have, & the gap narrows considerably. I'd still give the Exact the edge for its more sparkly treble, which the 3600s line contact (bonded, I was sorry to discover after purchase) gives up against the stock conical. Still, the 3600 with said line contact is good value at around a third of the Exacts price. Even the stock cartridge is as equally enjoyable as the Exact in a musical sense.
I agree that the 3600 is more enjoyable than it has any right to be for the money. In my opinion though if you change the stylus, and presumably the plastic cantilever, it's not a 3600 any more as I think it's those two things that give it its sound. Cheap AT carts with alloy cantilevers sound quite different.
 
I agree that the 3600 is more enjoyable than it has any right to be for the money. In my opinion though if you change the stylus, and presumably the plastic cantilever, it's not a 3600 any more as I think it's those two things that give it its sound. Cheap AT carts with alloy cantilevers sound quite different.

Others elsewhere on the net agree about the CF cantilever. If you look closely you'll see it's even tapered. The Vivid Line stylus I have has an aluminium cantilever, & to be honest I'd not buy another. Finding a finely cut stone is bonded annoys me beyond words. If I were to get serious I'd see if the CF cantilever can be retipped with a nice nude diamond!
 
I don't know if you're trying to be funny?
Unusually, perhaps, no I wasn't; just genuinely surprised by your comments but not challenging them at all. I did say I was unaware where Rega were today but they've always been at the forefront of British hifi engineering. Were SME arms not cast? I've no idea, nor that this method was a leap ahead in tonearm technology.
Are they the best arms in the world? Maybe not but donkeys? Don't be ridiculous.
You mis-read or misunderstood 'donkey's years'; it mean a long time, not a negative comment on quality. No idea what the best arms in the world are as this would depend upon too many factors, not least compatibility with the cart's they suit.

Your reply would suggest I have an axe to grind re. Rega; I haven't; I respect the company as others do
 
Last edited:
Wouldn't precision cutting a hole at the end of a tapered CF cantilever (for fitting the nude diamond) be a bit of a big ask at this humble price range?
 
Wouldn't precision cutting a hole at the end of a tapered CF cantilever (for fitting the nude diamond) be a bit of a big ask at this humble price range?

I don't know, just thinking out loud. I'm not a retipper & don't know much about it. I do know that cantilevers can be reused. I have a Jico SAS where the diamond appears to be glued directly to a very skinny boron cantilever.

Also, why does a cartridge/stylus in a humble price range make a poor choice for retipping? Humble price need not mean humble performance, & I prefer the 3600 to some much more expensive cartridges. The Vivid Line stylus proves to me that it's worthy of a good tip.
 
Never realised Exact was elliptical. Now I am sure I will start to notice IGD more! Ohh, no.
There is elliptical, and then there's elliptical - which is why we should have the tip specs.
The Ogura 'Vital' profile used on the Exact has a 5um minor radius which in old money is a hyper-elliptical. Better on IGD than standard tips which are usually 8um.
Hopefully this (or something close) is being used on the ND5.
 
I don't know how you'd judge that but they needed a better MM in the range than the Exact given the advancement in the decks.
I like the Exact on my P3/50, but it would be odd if ten years of development hadn't produced an improvement.
 
Why do you think a retipper would be scornful at being asked if a 3600 can be retipped yes or no? How is it different to any other cartridge?
It costs twenty quid, tracks at three grams and has a plastic cantilever!
I did say I was unaware where Rega were today but they've always been at the forefront of British hifi engineering. Were SME arms not cast? I've no idea, nor that this method was a leap ahead in tonearm technology.
Rega were the first company to cast the entire tube, headshell and bearing boss in one piece. It was a huge leap forward, at the time it was considered impossible, and it's the reason Rega arms are such amazing value and performance.

While Rega's current arms are better than original ones, the old guys are still very good and still competitive.
 
"I was a little concerned about over tightening and stripping the threads but Rega says that these are good for more than the 0.4nM provided by their cartridge torque driver, and tell me that they have gone as far as 1.5nM before something gave out. And that something was the hex head of the bolt rather than the cartridge body."

No need to worry about that then I guess.
 


advertisement


Back
Top