NickofWimbledon
pfm Member
Not sure its helpfull as I notice many seem to like the transport and DAC beeing seperates, which I dont.
I clearly preferred a single player, for example a Naim or Rega of the agenda here.
I've tried 3 or 4 transports, amo a Roksan, Cambridge, Rega (used as transport only)
Found out I preferred single players, nothing wrong with the players, just not for me.
I mainly used Chord, Naim and Rega DACs but soon left it again, with no intention to proceed.
Thanks. It's interesting for many reasons, including that I will presumably need a replacement for my CDS2 one day.
My first foray into this was getting a Core, onto which I ripped all my CDs as a way to transport their content to Tasmania. While it was here, we compared my 2-box CDS2 to CDs ripped onto the Core and then played back via NDX2/XPSDR. None of us could consistently pick which we were hearing, never mind maintain a preference. Comparing the rip or the CD to streams from Tidal/ Qobuz mainly showed that some digital versions are better than others.
By contrast, using the NDX2 as a DAC in this way but without the XPSDR to power it led to a pretty consistent preference for playing CDs directly in the CDS2. I concluded from that that all the comments here about how NDX2 (or nDAC) needed a better PS for its DAC to deliver its potential were completely true.
For now, I assume that getting another Core and and doing some more ripping will give the system in Wimbledon CD replay at least as good as I currently have from the CDS2, if a tad less user-friendly. If that is beaten by a CD Transport feeding the NDX2, I'll get one.
How are other people expecting to deal with the demise of current CD payers?