Strictly Stereo
Trade: Strictly Stereo
that doesn't sugggest that any are paying Mqa
This does...
http://www.mqa.co.uk/professional/for-playback-providers
that doesn't sugggest that any are paying Mqa
Sorry, what's the point?
To let you judge for yourself if noise-shaped 16 bits is as good as 24 bits - or if there is any difference at all.
To let you judge for yourself if noise-shaped 16 bits is as good as 24 bits - or if there is any difference at all.
Thanks, being an analogue purist, IMHO it will fail.
Yes. The snag at present is that most people will presumably need a Windows or Mac version. I don't use either, and I tend to do programming by using the simplicity of RISC OS programming first, then port to Linux/GCC. However by suppling the source code I can hope someone else can deal with porting, or use what I've done as a stimulus to do something better! That way people need not be slowed down to the low speed at which I write programs!
"Fail", in what way? Fail to tell if there is a difference or not?
According to the article highlighted by the OP ,MQA are trying to get a stranglehold on "Hi-Rez" music. I predict they will fail to do that.
According to the article highlighted by the OP ,MQA are trying to get a stranglehold on "Hi-Rez" music. I predict they will fail to do that.
I saw that , I still don't think hardware manufacturers are actually paying.for example , Audio quest paying a royalty on that little stick dac they make as well as having to invest to get it Mqa ready, I don't think so.
And in the process create market fragmentation and consumer confusion.
Just what was needed ...
I will quote what you said. You think... but you dont know.
And you think without analasing what is availble out there. That is not proper thinking process.
I think the licensing income will be per stream. Any other costs at other stages incedental if anything.
This is the $64k question.The question brings forth several different responses in my mind:
1. Having a proprietary system where licensing fees are bled off at so many stages, whatever the perceived SQ benefits are just isn't a good idea, IMO.
2. Has it been proven that 16/44.1k is indeed inadequate? Many stated that so-called Hi Res sounded better then others pointed out that the mastering was different! If this is the case, the music industry has been extremely economical with the truth!