Rattle's three concerts at the Proms this year epitomised what I love and find frustrating about him as a conductor. He obviously knows the scores intimately and delights in bringing out details that other conductors miss or gloss over. In so much 20th Century music this works fabulously and last night's Messaien was a great example of that. Like much Modernism, it's all about surface and texture. The Rheingold also worked for me, a real revelation, aided by some wonderful singing. Sometimes the attention to detail means that 'the big picture' can get a little lost. Unfortunately the Choral symphony on Sunday failed, very slightly, in that respect. The two opening movements were brisk, exciting and incredibly virile and I really felt it had the makings of a truely great interpretation. The slow movement was beautifully played and measured but sounded like a different conductor had stepped up to the podium in the (prolonged) pause between movements. The audience didn't help the collective concentration mind you. The finale sounded different again, with fantastic singing from the Birmingham chorus but a very average quartet of soloists. This was still a very fine performance, one of the best live renditions of the piece I've heard and a considerable improvement on the last time I heard Rattle in the work. Perhaps the 9th is one of those pieces that's cursed by it's reputation as A Great Masterpiece that it can never quite come off in the way you feel it potentially could. What I've rarely felt with Rattle conducting the central German repertoire is the sense of an over-arching musical idea or structure. This is something that happens very rarely in my experience and usually only in live concerts but he demands to be judged by the highest musical standards.