iHaveNoNaim
Active Member
Yes. I would be perfectly happy to contribute a pro rata share of the cost of the PnP line in return for an agreed delivery date for the existing products. I do not accept that it is reasonable to increase the cost of paying for the Mdac2 or detox by any more than than pro rata share reflecting a cost of production. I think this is equally unreasonable whether you don't want a streamer, can't afford any more expense or don't fancy investing any more in an overdue product.
Unless an external manufacturer is in fact manufacturing the product (fine by me- they can provide a guaranteed delivery date) then the theoretical cost of manufacturing that way is not the cost of production.
Given that no one actually wants the streamer module (if they want it at all) before they get the Mdac 2, you have to ask yourself the question, why is the streamer module being manufactured before the Mdac2 or indeed the detox?
I don't want a streamer I do however want my much delayed Detox and MDAC2, I feel that I'm being penalised for having a setup which has served me well for many years and doesn't require a streamer. Unless of course someone could enlighten me into how I can benefit from a streamer when I play everything through a PC running 'Dirac live' (Tidal for streaming, media monkey for ripped CDs, iPlayer, Netflix) which does room correction before the MDAC. As I understand it I won't be able to perform this room correction playing through the streamer.