Mike Reed
pfm Member
Residual current contact breaker? (100 A; surely not) Has the RCBO changed its name, Ian?RCCB
Residual current contact breaker? (100 A; surely not) Has the RCBO changed its name, Ian?RCCB
With that amount of audio for watching movies he probably just thinks it was a particularly dynamic part of the film (sorry, IWC)Nothing from the OP since yesterday.
I really hope he hasn't electrocuted himself...
Residual Current Circuit Breaker. More likely to be the double pole main switch in his Consumer Unit if it’s rated at 100A. This suggests that he’s already on a TT supply as he’s also mentioned he’s out in the sticks. If he is on TT he already has an Earth Electrode and he’s doubled up with his new Electrode so more than likely at the same potential.Residual current contact breaker? (100 A; surely not) Has the RCBO changed its name, Ian?
Residual current contact breaker? (100 A; surely not) Has the RCBO changed its name, Ian?
Ta! I'm well aware of RCD and MCB + RCBO, being a combo of the two. I've plenty of each. It's just that I'd not come across RCCB (and was guessing what it stood for)The RCCB is more commonly known as an RCD
TT earth? not sure of the correlation with MCBs here.(in TT where EFLI is too high for MCBs to operate)
Have only scanned the posts so not at all sure what his situation/problem isHe's either confused or bonkers.
Some were obviously cheated quite early on, Mike.I'm a bit thick sometimes but are sarcastically referring to captive mains leads which, esp. in cheap stuff, still happens. Captive leads, if substantial enough, have to be theoretically better than a plug and socket (IEC) but those tweakers which like to try different leads would feel cheated.
I'm a bit thick sometimes but are sarcastically referring to captive mains leads which, esp. in cheap stuff, still happens. Captive leads, if substantial enough, have to be theoretically better than a plug and socket (IEC) but those tweakers which like to try different leads would feel cheated.
I know of people who have cut off captive leads close to a piece of equipment's rear panel and then fitted an inline IEC C14 connector to the tail left, purely so that they can plug a fancy mains lead into it...
It's the first 2 ft that matters, not the last 6 inch.... MatronI know of people who have cut off captive leads close to a piece of equipment's rear panel and then fitted an inline IEC C14 connector to the tail left, purely so that they can plug a fancy mains lead into it...
I'm not technical like you but even I now understand that a 10db improvement in every noise and distortion measurement = bugger all difference.Made bugger all difference when replaced with literal kettle leads. Maybe I went deaf during that time. What certainly didn't happen was that my hifi got worse. Funnily enough every component got about 10db better in pretty much every noise and distortion measurement.
Makes sense. 60 dB, normal speaking voice, to 70, clearly audible. 70-80, likewise. But at the extremes, no.If you were going from -70db to -80 it's a big deal. That's like crappy turntable with obvious bearing rumble to a pristine new lp12 main bearing.
But it's a log scale, so seeing I went from about -100db to -110db overall I was just going from quite far past being audible to not a cat in hells chance of being audible.
I've been told of two reg's which can have a bearing on (dedicated) radial circuit installations. They concern having the capability of locally (to the hifi) disconnecting the supply via switch or unplugging. A bit vague but something I'd not come across before.
I know of people who have cut off captive leads close to a piece of equipment's rear panel and then fitted an inline IEC C14 connector to the tail left, purely so that they can plug a fancy mains lead into it...
I've been told of two reg's which can have a bearing on (dedicated) radial circuit installations.
One: I'm not giving advice. Two: It's brought, not bought (buy/bought; bring/brought). Three: You are correct, I don't have knowledge of electrical reg's as I'm not an electrician. Four: Which is why I've mentioned sth relevant that I'd just been told. Five: The 2 reg's are: 537-04-01 and 537-04-04, which cover the same ground. You would know of these, of course, and I've no evidence or intuition that this info. is incorrect, as you say it is.Not true, I have..... bought.... these up before and you have obviously chosen to ignore it. Yet you always pop up in and give advice on electrical installations even though you have no knowledge on electrical regulations.
I just mentioned that in another cable threadFunny that those buying multi hundred pound power cables don’t talk much about the 60p worth of cable sitting inside the component wired to the IEC socket…
Funny that those buying multi hundred pound power cables don’t talk much about the 60p worth of cable sitting inside the component wired to the IEC socket…