Indeed, you could also make a similar argument in relation to Islam. There are crucial differences however. Neither Catholic, Protestant, Buddhist or Hindu have ever constituted what Abraham Leon characterises as a ‘people class.’ Whilst adherents to those religions cited above have, at different points in history and to greater or lesser degrees, been persecuted, none have been subject to the sort of systematic oppression of anti-Semitism, that determined their economic status (and therefore historical role) by allowing them only one specific occupation (ok, Islam
IS subject to systematic oppression, but that is a very recent development).
Additionally, I, as a white (lapsed) Christian male, do not have a Christian ‘cultural identity’ in the manner that some non-observant Jews claim to possess. It makes no sense to claim a ‘Christian culture’ due to the plethora of ethnic, national and social divisions that characterise Christianity. Christians were never systematically persecuted and marginalised to the extent that engendered Leon’s people class’ status of Jews. It is this that negates the anti-Semitic argument that Jews, as Jews, do not experience racism, as Jews are not a ‘race’ (ditto Islamophobia).
“Leon argues that the Jews represent historically a social group with specific economic functions, firstly in commerce and later in usury. They are both a class and a people–the term he uses to describe them is ‘people-class’. It is because the Jews preserved themselves through their activities as a class that they also defined themselves as having a common ethnic identity, based on shared religious and linguistic features.“
To be anti-Zionist does not mean you are anti-Semitic.
socialistworker.co.uk