Jim Audiomisc
pfm Member
I’m surprised there isn’t more diversity within the magazine marketplace. They all seem pretty formulaic these days. I’d have thought the forums would have proven beyond doubt there was an interest in technical topics, just look at our DIY room, ...
I also think the culture has changed and we are unlikely to see the equivalent of JE Sugden publishing the A21 schematic, in depth discussion of triples, current dumping etc from Peter Walker. ...
*This actually being a strong suspicion as to why so many computer tech companies are so anti-Right To Repair, i.e. they know if they were forced to publish schematics it would highlight any copied/stolen ideas.
FWIW I did ask the editor of HFN if they'd consider doing a 'book' that reprinted a number of the ancient items like the series by Radford and Jim Sugden on their amp designs, and other 'DIY'/tech info that isn't now easily available. e.g. some of the old things by Kelly and others. As both an enthusiast and an 'academic' it niggles me that informative material becomes 'unobtainium'. But he simply wasn't interested. Perhaps rightly. assuming it simply wouldn't sell enough copies to be worthwhile. However the presumption is that 'technical' loses readers. Equivalent of Hawking's publisher's motto that every equation halves the sales of a book.
They do publish some 'from the vault' reprints of old items, though. And these can be interesting. Probably more accessible for most readers than the above. No 'hard sums' or circuit diagrams.
Yes, I'm also annoyed by the way some makers/designers hide the details of what they make - sometimes symultaneously getting *patents* that obfuscate or omit key details. (HDCD being a classic example of that!) It seems crazy to me that a designer might do something like add hardened ball bearings to the potting compound of their transformers to try and stop anyone else from seeing the details of their design. Different world to the 1970s and before when designers cheerfully shared info with each other. Not a change for the better IMHO.