Confused ? What's the difference between :-

[Amber Audio]

Wait until someone comes along and tells you all you need is a pie with a hat on...

​

 

[Sue Pertwee-Tyr]

Cold apple pie and cold custard , Yum

Think of the disc of the pie as your source file store. It’s circular, so that helps a bit. The filling is the music. The stream of custard is yer streamer, obvs, innit. Then yer spoon, that’s like the interconnect and your gob is the DAC, where the contents of the spoon/interconnect ends up and is converted into sound, in this case the ‘yum’.

Hope this helps

 

[Colin L]

Ok, so what's a renderer then?

 

[AudioAl]

Ok, so what's a renderer then?

A WHAT !!!!!

 

[Sue Pertwee-Tyr]

Ok, so what's a renderer then?

It’s a bloke who comes round an plasters the outside of your house instead of the inside.

 

[Amber Audio]

It’s a bloke who comes round an plasters the outside of your house instead of the inside.

It's what you do with a 'puter and 3D Studio obvs

 

[hifinutt]

mqa wtf is that

yes my point precisely al !!

 

[Ian Austen]

John Darko explains streaming quite well in this video:

 

[Chris81]

@AudioAl Why do you use such a stupid headline instead of:
Confused ? What's the difference between a Dac and a Streamer?

I hate such attention seeking non saying headlines.

 

[AudioAl]

@AudioAl Why do you use such a stupid headline instead of:
Confused ? What's the difference between a Dac and a Streamer?

I hate such attention seeking non saying headlines.

You looked so it must work

 

[Amber Audio]

@AudioAl Why do you use such a stupid headline instead of:
Confused ? What's the difference between a Dac and a Streamer?

I hate such attention seeking non saying headlines.

Valuable and productive post, truly insightful - congrats!

 

[Chris81]

You looked so it must work

I knew that this answer would come because that was your intention otherwise you would have use a useful headline instead of this one.
It always works but I think it sucks! Imagine everybody would use such types of headlines only to seek attention, it would make the search function senseless.

 

[Chris81]

Valuable and productive post, truly insightful - congrats!

Thank you, I would also like to give you the same credit for your post #41.
Valuable and productive post, truly insightful - congrats!

 

[AudioAl]

I knew that this answer would come because that was your intention otherwise you would have use a useful headline instead of this one.
It always works but I think it sucks! Imagine everybody would use such types of headlines only to seek attention, it would make the search function senseless.

And breath , In and out nice and calm

Word of advice , If you HATE the title why look , Just move on

 

[AudioAl]

Thank you, I would also give you credit for yours in #41. Congrats!

I thought 41 was very funny

 

[Chris81]

And breath , In and out nice and calm

Word of advice , If you HATE the title why look , Just move on

That was the next thing that I expected as an answer. Always the same.

I looked at it because I have hoped for that it isn't a stupid intention seeking headline, but it was and so I called the BS because it is annoying.

 

[AudioAl]

That was the next thing that I expected as an answer. Always the same.

,

As you have seen into the future twice now , Can I ask for the winning lotto numbers please

 

[TimF]

666

 

[Chris81]

Unfortunately not, I only have a good premonition for some kind of answers. Good luck with your lotto tip.

 

[Sue Pertwee-Tyr]

That was the next thing that I expected as an answer. Always the same.

I looked at it because I have hoped for that it isn't a stupid intention seeking headline, but it was and so I called the BS because it is annoying.

I’d just like to point out that I’ve now wasted far more time reading through the spat about the thread title, than was wasted by somebody reading the OP to find out what the thread was about.