Alco
pfm Member
Yes, I had the chance to compare both amps. (only for a few, brief moments though) I think I could easily live with the NAD C316BEE V2 for a long period but to me the IO is in another leaque. My first thoughts after comparing the two was that the NAD's sound was a bit more rough, and more forward/bright. The IO sounded a bit more natural, refined, spacious and more involving to me, but somehow voices sounded a bit too far away in the soundstage, compared with the NAD. (I hope I explained this right, as English it not my native language)The NAD C316BEE is a real cracker, only 40w per channel but sounds much bigger. Are you able to compare to the IO?
I did swap the supplied powercable for an Audioquest NRG-X3 though, which was a no-brainer. It brought back the voices more to the front of the soundstage, and transparency also improved a bit. (I did the same with a Brio-r I had in the past (around 2012/2013) I also liked the Brio-r back then but found it a little too smooth/polite for my liking, lacking a bit of sparkle. Despite my fear the IO's treble would sound similar, there's no lack of top-end sparkle/clarity.
(what I liked about the NAD btw was the fact that it could be switched to stand-by mode, in which it consumed next to nothing on electricity, 0,5watt. (an attractive feature in these expensive times!)
Last edited: