ff1d1l
pfm Member
Very. This and a grassroots kids movement might be what breaks the NRA stranglehold.Good to see market forces pushing business away from the NRA.
Very. This and a grassroots kids movement might be what breaks the NRA stranglehold.Good to see market forces pushing business away from the NRA.
I think this is correct. The intention was that if a government turned rogue then the public would rise up in militias, seize power and call the miscreants to account. Meanwhile back in the real world do we imagine that a few good ol' boys, with MI-15s or not, could defeat the US Army? Now OK, the Vietcong did a pretty good job but to be fair that was an away game and the pitch was in poor condition.
We all know what the solution is, we all know that while senators are being funded by the NRA it will never happen. It'san American problem for Americans to solve. If they can tolerate a school shooting every few months, and it seems that they can, who are we to argue?
The second amendment is in the constitution which came about following independence from Britain. My understanding was that the right to bear arms was so that US citizens could not be subject to a draconian government again.
A similar public shaming of those who financially support the NRA should be instigated - use bully tactics against bullies
What it also does is bring the USA 'money for votes' bribery, or 'support for your election opponent' blackmail system into clear focus. AIPAC controls Israel/ME policy the same way. Quite how people think this kind of 'democracy for sale' is superior escapes me. Not saying UK is much better with the biased media induced hysteria.
I think this is correct. The intention was that if a government turned rogue then the public would rise up in militias, seize power and call the miscreants to account.
Alas, the reaction may demonstrate that they agree with Chairman Mao about solving problems via the barrel of a gun! Cold dead hands, etc.
Utterly bonkers video advertisement from the NRA here, virtually calling for war against anyone who is against Trump and the NRA:
Straight out of the CHAOS rulebook.
Ah, thanks Tones, didn't know that.It's actually completely wrong. The original intention was that the USA would be like Switzerland was to become, a country without a standing army. What the Founding Fathers envisaged as their fighting force was a continuation of the Minutemen
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minutemen
armed citizens ready to put down their tools and take up their guns at a minute's notice. However, the USA found that it didn't work - constant conflict with native Americans as the young USA expanded necessitated a standing army. The Minutemen idea gradually morphed into the present-day National Guard.
She's great. Intelligent, eloquent and driven. People like her can change the world. A group of people, in this case, the youth of America, deciding en masse that this time, enough is enough. If I were among the entitled white sociopaths of the NRA, I'd be scared because this time, a critical mass has been reached. Change is coming whether they like it or not and those demanding it cannot be bought.Another terrific speech from a student in favour of sensible gun controls:
I like the way she uses the psychopath NRA spokeswoman's words ("we're coming for you") against the NRA.
What a contrast to the narcissistic dumbo in the White House.
That NRA spokesperson is a bonafide sociopath. Apparently, she started arming herself after receiving a threat from a listener to her former CNN radio show (following her commenting that it was ok for American soldiers to urinate on Taliban corpses, after which CNN decided to distance itself from her rantings).
What You Should Know About NRA Spokesperson Dana Loesch
https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a18663982/who-is-dana-loesch-nra-spokesperson/
"She got her start as a mommy blogger"
what the hell does that mean?