Not to waste time on this, but 75% of the material on RT is as Tony describes, mostly presented, it has to be said, by crumpled US Academics who never made it to the big time. The other 25 % does cover some material that the other channels do not, as in, for example, Belgian politics, or sport, where the coverage isn't bad as long as you don't catch one of the Russian doping moments.
It is funded by the Russian government, and does indeed represent the views of its president. To pretend otherwise is to be blind to the truth. That doesn't make it necessarily a bad watch, in the way that NCIS, a piece of US propaganda, isn't a bad watch either.
It is funded by the Russian government, and does indeed represent the views of its president. To pretend otherwise is to be blind to the truth. That doesn't make it necessarily a bad watch, in the way that NCIS, a piece of US propaganda, isn't a bad watch either.