eisenach
pfm Member
From an EU perspective the wine mountain is a positive that allows an EU job creation subsidy to convert wine into ethanol and hand gel.
I'm having difficulty conjuring up that image. A wine mountain. Sounds good, though.
From an EU perspective the wine mountain is a positive that allows an EU job creation subsidy to convert wine into ethanol and hand gel.
Has anyone ever seen a wine lake?I'm having difficulty conjuring up that image. A wine mountain. Sounds good, though.
Increased job opportunities within the UK for people from outside EU.Give us a few ?
Has anyone ever seen a wine lake?
How well will that play with those who responded to the call of the Leave campaign’s ‘breaking point’ (and similar) ads?Increased job opportunities within the UK for people from outside EU.
Additional university places for Chinese students who pay for their UK education; (if you recall the EU students were on a free or reduced rate).
Has anyone ever seen a wine lake?
Increased job opportunities within the UK for people from outside EU.
UK control of immigration instead of a free movement obligation and as i know UK child allowance payments are no longer sent back to the country where their family lives.Why is that a positive for the UK ? I see it as a negative.
EU immigration is easily reversed if job opportunities decline. As we have seen with very large numbers of EU nationals leaving the UK since 2016.
Immigration from outside the UK is almost entirely going to stay and take UK passports.
Next to the red tape mountains.Yes. They're not far from the butter mountains.
Increased job opportunities within the UK for people from outside EU.
Additional university places for Chinese students who pay for their UK education; (if you recall the EU students were on a free or reduced rate).
The key word was 'control'.How well will that play with those who responded to the call of the Leave campaign’s ‘breaking point’ (and similar) ads?
Is that like a role for, well, you know....?The key word was 'control'.
But to those for whom the ‘breaking point’ poster resonated, ‘control’ was largely synonymous with ‘prevent’.The key word was 'control'.
UK control of immigration instead of a free movement obligation and as i know UK child allowance payments are no longer sent back to the country where their family lives.
Sleaze swamps, if that is your collective definition of a group of politicians, will always be needed. The EU swamp is gone, a reduction in Westminster numbers, perhaps to a level of 400 so they all have a seat would sort it, followed by a 50% reduction in the lords.Meanwhile we seem to have developed our very own sleaze swamps. I think I’d prefer a wine lake, TBH.
There is an upside of the pay and child allowance money circulating in the UK.A maximum of £35 a week for a hypothetical 2 kids. So if the 2 kids were in the UK using schools and doctors that would be better ? Because they certainly will be in the future and they will be staying.
Estimates of Brexit costs are in the £50-100 billion range.
Talk about wood and trees.
No, not a collective noun for politicians. Rather, an observation that political sleaze has increased dramatically in recent years, and my feeling is that this is partly down to the Brexit vote which has enabled and emboldened a proportion of the worst, sleaziest types.Sleaze swamps, if that is your collective definition of a group of politicians, will always be needed.
No, unless you’re talking about an extremely low number of people to the point they are inconsequential from the 17.4 million. How many people do you think this poster might have ‘resonated’ with?But to those for whom the ‘breaking point’ poster resonated, ‘control’ was largely synonymous with ‘prevent’.