Purité Audio
Trade: Purite Audio
I am showing what the manufacturer would have you believe and the truth.
Keith
Keith
That’s the problem - a lot of words that intentionally or not bamboozle. Now have a look at the measurements Keith posted.One of the first manufacturers of these USB regenerator devices was Uptone Audio with their USB Regen. Here is a link to the explanation they provide as to why these devices can produce an audible improvement
https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0660/6121/files/UpTone_REGEN_tech_summary.pdf
Our photos for our profiles say it all. Such a difference.I am showing what the manufacturer would have you believe and the truth.
Keith
I am showing what the manufacturer would have you believe and the truth.
Keith
I have a regen but I didn’t buy it because of any technical pdfs. It’s not the ultimate but in certain dac configurations it’s really hard to say that it doesn’t make a difference.That’s the problem - a lot of words that intentionally or not bamboozle. Now have a look at the measurements Keith posted.
I’ll repeat, I’m no expert but surely a set of technical measurements does not give the game away with respect to design or implementation.I get why you say that.
The manufacturer might be hiding behind commercial sensitivities due to their BS but they might also be genuine. Copying is so very rife we can’t know easily which is the reason for hiding the technical details. Publishing specs gives massive clues about what has been implemented.
I can’t be sure about electronics or speaker drivers but in my field of IT if I get to know what and RPA system or AI / Cognitive has achieved it gives me a huge steer as to what to address.I’ll repeat, I’m no expert but surely a set of technical measurements does not give the game away with respect to design or implementation.
I thought yours was a Lion! My hound is a lean 43kg and frisky, quite a handful.Oh well, at least we both have dog avatars.
You were sneering and you know it. In a thread that is complaining about on sneering at subj, this is not OK.like i said - i find it somehow touching ... everyone has their own gods. are the 'objectivist gods' not 'numerical'? you're welcome to rename them.
You were sneering and you know it. In a thread that is complaining about on sneering at subj, this is not OK.
Alas, we are still exactly in the same place in the debate. And after thinking about it for a long time, I have come to an inescapable conclusion that it isn't, for example, some mysterious and unmeasured charachteristic that makes tube equipment sound "better" - it is audible level of second harmonic distortion.
Since then, I replaced my very expensive tube gear (Canary Audio) with moderate priced solid state gear (Emotiva), put away my tube buffers and my USB reclockers. I now insist that my gear measures very well, because if it can't reproduce simple sine tones without adding distortion, it will do worse still when playing much more complex music.
I thought yours was a Lion! My hound is a lean 43kg and frisky, quite a handful.
It's a Jeff Koons Poodle I worked on recently.I thought yours was a Lion! My hound is a lean 43kg and frisky, quite a handful.
That's irrelevant, it's like suggesting that we can't comment on what we see because we can't see in infra red or UV.What percentage of the world around us are we able to observe, measure and explain? 4% is it?
honestly -i've NEVER found specs to tell me ANYTHING useful about how a hifi product actually SOUNDS ...and after discovering some products with inferior specs that sounded far better than the high-spec'ed kit that i'd been chasing I pretty much learned to ignore it altogether. But i find it oddly touching, the spec warriors who cling so desperately to their numerical gods